Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Digital\s+modes\s+vs\.\s+digital\s+modes\s+vs\.\s+CW\s+etc\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Digital\s+modes\s+vs\.\s+digital\s+modes\s+vs\.\s+CW\s+etc\.\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Digital modes vs. digital modes vs. CW etc. (score: 1): Author: "John Santillo" <u1004467@warwick.net>; Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 20:37:31 -0500; What I would like to see is a real field experiment using a variety of different digital modes over a known path and known distant over a short period of time. A qualitative study pitting one digital; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2018-01/msg00129.html (7,271 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Digital modes vs. digital modes vs. CW etc. (score: 1): Author: Mark Spencer <mark@alignedsolutions.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 15:00:11 -0800; If anyone in the PNW / Vancouver lower mainland area wants to try something along these lines let me know. Based on my experiences over the last few years on a path from CN89 to CN94 on 144 MHz I am; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2018-01/msg00131.html (10,021 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]