Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Contest\s+rules\s+etc\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Contest\s+rules\s+etc\.\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Contest rules etc. (score: 1): Author: w8zn@comcast.net; Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:52:19 +0000 (UTC); I've been watching this for several days, weeks, months. I have some simple observations. Back in the 80's, during a September contest I believe, there was a huge tropo opening between the midwest (C; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-03/msg00119.html (9,311 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Contest rules etc. (score: 1): Author: Duane - N9DG <n9dg@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 09:51:13 -0700 (PDT); Here's is my take on why so few newly licensed ops venture into VHF weak signal today. Back around the mid 80's to early 90's the whole promotional focus of amateur radio shifted away from being some; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-03/msg00120.html (8,752 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] Contest rules etc. (score: 1): Author: Ron Hooper <w4wa@alltel.net>; Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 13:32:49 -0400; Hi Terry & Duane Both of you guys brought up some very good points. Thanks for sharing. Ron. _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com ht; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-03/msg00128.html (10,336 bytes)
4. Re: [VHFcontesting] Contest rules etc. (score: 1): Author: "Mike (KA5CVH) Urich" <ka5cvh@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 15:34:04 -0500; Mike adds, IMHO ... Back in the late 70's a large number of new hams, at least those in the Houston area were, 11 meter SSB enthusiasts that got sick and tired of putting up with the linear lipped 10; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-03/msg00154.html (8,192 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]