- 1. [VHFcontesting] CW in VHF test (score: 1)
- Author: ns3t@arrl.net (Jamie Dupree)
- Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:54 2003
- Just a gentle reminder to many about this coming weekend - don't forget to check for those souls calling CQ down below 50.100. For those of us with mediocre antenna setups, the extra CW effort would
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg02059.html (7,350 bytes)
- 2. [VHFcontesting] CW in VHF test (score: 1)
- Author: k1ep@mgef.org (Ed K1EP)
- Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:54 2003
- The VHF contest is one of the few contests that allow mixed mode contacts. Many times I will be calling CQ (above 50.125) and will get a response from someone in CW. I find that quite acceptable and
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg02060.html (8,396 bytes)
- 3. [VHFcontesting] CW in VHF test (score: 1)
- Author: ve7cyt@sprint.ca (clements)
- Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:54 2003
- If it is clear...call away on CW. Even if it is busy, the cw signal will put you on par with a weak SSB sig. I would assume that the main thing is to stay out of the DX window. 73, Kevin VA3OR FN14th
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg02069.html (9,316 bytes)
- 4. [VHFcontesting] CW in VHF test (score: 1)
- Author: flowersa@alltel.net (Andrew T. Flowers, K0SM)
- Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:54 2003
- I've always been a big believer in X-mode QSOs in the contest. I would venture to say nearly half of my mults on 2m the last time I was on in June were x-mode, at least to initiate the QSO. I've foun
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg02070.html (10,706 bytes)
- 5. [VHFcontesting] CW in VHF test (score: 1)
- Author: ka5cvh@ka5cvh.com (Mike Urich)
- Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:54 2003
- If it is clear...call away on CW. Even if it is busy, the cw signal will put you on par with a weak SSB sig. I would assume that the main thing is to stay out of the DX window. Last year my son and I
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg02072.html (7,771 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu