Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Best\s+integrated\s+package\s+for\s+VHF\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Best\s+integrated\s+package\s+for\s+VHF\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Best integrated package for VHF (score: 1): Author: ezimmerm@erols.com (Eugene Zimmerman); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:13 2003; Scott N3RA recently asked a very useful question on this reflector -- what radios do people use on VHF. I would like to go one further and ask which integrated radio - one that covers on 6 meters and; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg00827.html (8,688 bytes)
2. [VHFcontesting] Best integrated package for VHF (score: 1): Author: johngeig@yahoo.com (John Geiger); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:13 2003; Having run a couple of these rigs, I would have to go for the Kenwood TS2000X. You get all the VHF bands of the other, except for 222 mhz in the FT736. However, you cannot get 6, 222, and 1296 all in; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg00828.html (11,331 bytes)
3. [VHFcontesting] Best integrated package for VHF (score: 1): Author: k1whs@worldpath.net (DAVID C. OLEAN); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:13 2003; Hi Gene, I have some experience with a Yaesu FT-847 on six meters in a multi multi operation with a big six meter antenna....The FT-847 was not up to the task in contest conditions. It was definitely; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg00829.html (10,301 bytes)
4. [VHFcontesting] Best integrated package for VHF (score: 1): Author: k1whs@worldpath.net (DAVID C. OLEAN); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:13 2003; Hi again! I forgot to mention a few things about noise blankers as far as I have observed here at my QTH. I get very bad line noise that plagues me on 50, 144, and 222 MHz. I have been going round an; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg00830.html (9,251 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]