Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+ARRL\s+VHF\s+Contest\s+Rule\s+Revisions\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+ARRL\s+VHF\s+Contest\s+Rule\s+Revisions\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] ARRL VHF Contest Rule Revisions (score: 1): Author: n9dg@yahoo.com (Duane Grotophorst); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:19 2003; Given the all the posting regarding this topic it is clear that there is plenty of angst among the VHF contester crowd. Perhaps it is time for a significant rules overhaul for the ARRL VHF contests.; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01292.html (11,615 bytes)
2. [VHFcontesting] ARRL VHF Contest Rule Revisions (score: 1): Author: W4nf@aol.com (W4nf@aol.com); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:20 2003; As the coordinator for the W4IY VHF Contest Group I don't agree with limiting the number of ops at a LM station. It takes us at least 7-8 people to move all the equipment up the mountain for each con; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01304.html (7,664 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]