Author: Tim Marek via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 19:53:55 +0000 (UTC)
A few comments from one who used to write a monthly national VHF column... "The Weak Signal News" for CQ VHF magazine... (1) The current QST columnist does a damn fine job with what he has to work wi
Thank you! You've saved me the trouble. Columns like WA50 are a reflection of the submissions. I was so excited about a big 144 MHz opening back in ... '10? that I sent in a list of calls and grids.
I everyone wants more reporting of activities above 50 Mhz then SEND in REPORTS. Thats the secret to spreading the word, REPORTING. If you rely on passive internet data gathering that just isnt the b
I agree completely. On 1/12/2015 12:53 PM, Tim Marek via VHFcontesting wrote: A few comments from one who used to write a monthly national VHF column... "The Weak Signal News" for CQ VHF magazine...
I appreciate the comments re. the column. The column is for you. The basic format of the WA50 follows Gene, W3ZZ's with a column lead (s) followed by propagation reports and "here and there." I use m
Author: Stan Hilinski via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 13:23:54 -0500
Tim has certainly hit the nail on its head, I have a Facebook page the "205MorningReport" The contents are from the INPUT that I receive. The daily input to the page has been from VHF+ stations inter
If FB had a way to collate that, you could send it to N0JK periodically. But it's FB and because of that it would likely be a pain in the feedline. :-/ -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Trave