Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+A\s+Modest\s+Proposal\s+\-\s+Eliminate\s+Rover\s+Category\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+A\s+Modest\s+Proposal\s+\-\s+Eliminate\s+Rover\s+Category\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] A Modest Proposal - Eliminate Rover Category? (score: 1): Author: James Duffey <jamesduffey@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 20:40:47 -0600; Has the time come to move past the rover category? With the ARRL contest hierarchy unable to effectively deal with the various controversies surrounding the rover category and categories over the las; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-09/msg00120.html (9,299 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] A Modest Proposal - Eliminate Rover Category? (score: 1): Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com; Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 13:42:16 EDT; Rule 1.2 should be eliminated for other reasons. A few days back the subject of improving VHF contest activity was discussed here, including the suggestion of inviting other non-VHF active hams to yo; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-09/msg00126.html (9,437 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] A Modest Proposal - Eliminate Rover Category? (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <aa5jg@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 10:09:02 -0700 (PDT); And in the VHF contests it isn't true mobile activity as you have to travel to at least 2 different grid squares. What about the guy who goes mobiling within his own grid square? There is no category; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-09/msg00139.html (8,083 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]