Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+A\s+Halo\s+4\s+Stack\s+for\s+70cm\s+on\s+the\s+Cheap\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+A\s+Halo\s+4\s+Stack\s+for\s+70cm\s+on\s+the\s+Cheap\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] A Halo 4 Stack for 70cm on the Cheap (score: 1): Author: Alex <extraham@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:33:24 -0400 (GMT-04:00); Hi there, I just finished a construction article for a cheap 70cm halo 4 stack and posted it on my web site. You can access this article through the following link: http://www.kr1st.com/70cmstack.htm; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-07/msg00087.html (7,101 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] A Halo 4 Stack for 70cm on the Cheap (score: 1): Author: wbr wf4r <wbr@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:35:41 -0400; Alex, I just finished reading your article and would like to compliment you on a very nice job. I'm wondering what your vswr results are and what kind of bandwidth you have for a vswr of less than 1.; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-07/msg00089.html (7,838 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] A Halo 4 Stack for 70cm on the Cheap (score: 1): Author: Alex <kr1st@amsat.org>; Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:45:17 -0400; Hi Bill, Thank you for the nice comments. The SWR is less than 1.5:1 for a bandwidth of 3 MHz and it's 1.1:1 at 432.1 MHz. The SWR is 1:1 around 431.6 MHz. 73, --Alex KR1ST http://www.kr1st.com _____; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-07/msg00092.html (7,368 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]