Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+6m\s+JT65\s+at\s+\-1\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+6m\s+JT65\s+at\s+\-1\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] 6m JT65 at -1 (score: 1): Author: Kenneth Silverman <kenny.k2kw@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 17:51:36 -0400; Can someone please explain the logic of people staying on JT65 when they get reports of -1? When I was in C6 a month ago, when ever JT65 signal reports were in the single digits, the band was usually; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-07/msg00025.html (6,866 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] 6m JT65 at -1 (score: 1): Author: Mike Metroka via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 20:27:34 -0500; Hi Kenny, In JT65 a -1 signal report is the highest (strongest) report. Signal reports range from -1 down to about -30. A -1 report means that the station is coming in gangbusters! 73 Mike WB8BZK Can; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-07/msg00027.html (8,409 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] 6m JT65 at -1 (score: 1): Author: K7XC Tim Marek <k7xcnv1@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 02:07:24 +0000; It Makes NO SENSE AT ALL! FT8 or JT9E would be a much better way to go.... JT65 as a 6M terrestrial Mode is a waste of time compared to what can be done in the same time with a MODERN mode DESIGNED F; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-07/msg00028.html (9,668 bytes)
4. Re: [VHFcontesting] 6m JT65 at -1 (score: 1): Author: "Joel Harrison" <w5zn@w5zn.org>; Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 21:13:19 -0500; Beats me Kenny. Its just like two folks sitting across from each other at a table in a restaurant and texting each other!!!! :-)) 73 Joel W5ZN www.w5zn.org ___________________________________________; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-07/msg00029.html (8,319 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]