Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+50\s+MHz\s+Sprint\s+results\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+50\s+MHz\s+Sprint\s+results\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] 50 MHz Sprint results (score: 1): Author: "Ron WZ1V" <wz1v@juno.com>; Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2016 10:02:41 -0400; 50 MHz Fall Sprint Call: WZ1V Operator(s): WZ1V Station: WZ1V Class: Single Op HP QTH: FN31RH Operating Time (hrs): 3 Summary: Total: QSOs = 166 Mults = 71 Tot Dist(km) = 0 Total Score = 11,786 Club:; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2016-08/msg00031.html (7,129 bytes)
2. [VHFcontesting] 50 MHz Sprint results (score: 1): Author: "Ron Klimas WZ1V" <wz1v@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sun, 12 May 2019 12:00:42 -0400; 50 MHz Spring Sprint - 2019 Call: WZ1V Operator(s): WZ1V Station: WZ1V Class: Single Op HP QTH: FN31RH Operating Time (hrs): Summary: Total: QSOs = 45 Mults = 16 Total Score = 720 Club: North East We; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-05/msg00045.html (7,245 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] 50 MHz Sprint results (score: 1): Author: Stephen Hewlett via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 14:16:19 +0000 (UTC); 50 MHz Spring Sprint - 2019 Call: N4NIVOperator(s): N4NIVStation: N4NIV Class: Single Op LPQTH: FN42Operating Time (hrs): 3 Summary:Total: QSOs = 5 Mults = 2 Total Score = 10 Club: Comments: MFJ; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-05/msg00047.html (8,000 bytes)
4. Re: [VHFcontesting] 50 MHz Sprint results (score: 1): Author: Michael Clarson <wv2zow@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 15:35:40 -0400; While Ft-8 is slower than ssb, there was plenty of time to work everyone. _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesti; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-05/msg00051.html (8,847 bytes)
5. Re: [VHFcontesting] 50 MHz Sprint results (score: 1): Author: "Dave ." <kdcarlso@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 16:17:27 -0400; I think what Steve is pointing out is that there are too many stations ONLY using FT8 and everyone is missing out on contacts when this happens. There are people who are not on digital for various re; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-05/msg00052.html (9,922 bytes)
6. Re: [VHFcontesting] 50 MHz Sprint results (score: 1): Author: Alan Larson <wa6azp@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 14:54:13 -0700; I don't think they cared about increasing your score. They might have said that if you wanted to increase your score, you should have been on FT8. Perhaps the ARRL should add a "no computer modes" cl; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-05/msg00053.html (8,295 bytes)
7. Re: [VHFcontesting] 50 MHz Sprint results (score: 1): Author: Stephen Hewlett via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 02:18:22 +0000 (UTC); Alan, I'm sure they didn't care about increasing my score, nor I theirs. It seems to me to be a waste to use FT8 to contact hams who are local to you (within 30 miles) when either SSB or CW will do; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-05/msg00054.html (10,083 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]