Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+2019\s+January\s+VHF\s+Contest\s+Results\s+on\s+Line\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] 2019 January VHF Contest Results on Line (score: 1)
Author: JamesDuffey <jamesduffey@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 19:43:36 -0600
The results writeup for the January 2019 VHF Contest are now on line: < https://contests.arrl.org/ContestResults/2019/Jan-VHF-2019-FinalFullResults.pdf The digital modes, in particular FT8, played a
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-06/msg00072.html (7,559 bytes)

2. Re: [VHFcontesting] 2019 January VHF Contest Results on Line (score: 1)
Author: John Young via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 00:16:49 +0000 (UTC)
I dont do  just FM, I work W4IY multi op PH and Digital every June...... I dont like being on FT8 but when the sporadic e is gone, running is fruitless and we have worked everything on the band scope
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-06/msg00096.html (11,162 bytes)

3. Re: [VHFcontesting] 2019 January VHF Contest Results on Line (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 19:33:47 -0500
I haven't done a lot of FT8 operating but I am curious about something. The higher you go in bands, the more likely that there is jitter and drift in the signal. At 24 GHz I have some drift in my sig
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-06/msg00097.html (12,132 bytes)

4. Re: [VHFcontesting] 2019 January VHF Contest Results on Line (score: 1)
Author: John Young via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 01:10:35 +0000 (UTC)
Zack Good points. FT8 may not be useful above 1296 without adding some significant bandwidth as frequency goes up.  If it could be made to work up there it provides an enticing opportunity for those
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-06/msg00098.html (13,674 bytes)

5. Re: [VHFcontesting] 2019 January VHF Contest Results on Line (score: 1)
Author: Chris Lumens <chris@lumensoutdoors.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 21:11:45 -0400
I think this makes the assumption that the FT8 op's primary motivation is setting a high score, and I don't think we can make that assumption. You might suggest it's silly to compete if you're not t
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-06/msg00099.html (9,577 bytes)

6. Re: [VHFcontesting] 2019 January VHF Contest Results on Line (score: 1)
Author: John Young via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 01:59:47 +0000 (UTC)
Chris, I agree.  We all set objectives and work towards them.  When I run FM the objective is winning.  For W4IY this June the objective was test and tune.  If W4IY goes out in Sept the objective wil
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-06/msg00100.html (10,715 bytes)

7. Re: [VHFcontesting] 2019 January VHF Contest Results on Line (score: 1)
Author: John Kludt <johnnykludt@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 07:53:10 -0400
Zack, Fair question. And please remember there are a number of modes in the WSJT-X suite. They are there for a reason. Right now we are focused in this thread on FT8 but as we go up the bands, other
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-06/msg00101.html (14,440 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu