Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+144\s+Sprint\s+WZ1V\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+144\s+Sprint\s+WZ1V\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] 144 Sprint WZ1V (score: 1): Author: "Ron Klimas WZ1V" <wz1v@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 10:23:15 -0400; 144 MHz Fall Sprint Call: WZ1V Operator(s): WZ1V Station: WZ1V Class: Single Op HP QTH: FN31RH Operating Time (hrs): 3.5 Summary: Total: QSOs = 57 Mults = 21 Tot Dist(km) = 0 Total Score = 1,197 Club; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2018-09/msg00076.html (7,857 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] 144 Sprint WZ1V (score: 1): Author: Michael Clarson <wv2zow@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 10:46:48 -0400; Ron: Couldn't you have used a narrow filter to filter out the strong station? Sure-- you would miss some of the passband, but you could move around with each call. Also, I didn't think the east/west; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2018-09/msg00077.html (8,511 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] 144 Sprint WZ1V (score: 1): Author: "Ron Klimas WZ1V" <wz1v@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 11:36:05 -0400; Mike - interesting, I've observed almost everyone on 2M FT8 sticks to the established calling sequences. We TX second when pointed to western half of compass. We TX first when pointed eastwards. On 6; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2018-09/msg00080.html (10,427 bytes)
4. Re: [VHFcontesting] 144 Sprint WZ1V (score: 1): Author: "rgolley@comcast.net" <rgolley@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 12:07:53 -0400; RonI can't understand why some guys run 1500 watts on FT8. 狢 think that's one of the biggest issues down here. Weak signal??狢 run with agc off and try to adjust rf gain to the best point that I can; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2018-09/msg00082.html (10,814 bytes)
5. Re: [VHFcontesting] 144 Sprint WZ1V (score: 1): Author: Mark Spencer <mark@alignedsolutions.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 10:27:40 -0700; Hi: In so far as path losses on typical non enhanced tropo paths of say 350 miles could be over 200 dB at 144 MHz I'm thinking it might make sense for us not to all use the same 3Khz wide SSB channel; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2018-09/msg00086.html (12,394 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]