Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+1296\s+Digital\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+1296\s+Digital\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] 1296 Digital (score: 1): Author: John Kludt <johnnykludt@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 07:02:55 -0500; All, W4NH will be on all bands 6m to 70cm and 1296 from EM84ao for the January contest. On 1296 we will be running 100 - 150 watts into a pair of 45 element loop Yagi's at 30 feet. We view the Januar; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-01/msg00017.html (7,649 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] 1296 Digital (score: 1): Author: Buddy Morgan via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 12:10:01 +0000 (UTC); If you want to try some FT 8, before the contest, there were eight stations, in Florida, on 144.174, last night. There is FT 8 activity on 432.174, after our SSB net, (432.090 @2030 EST) on Thursday; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-01/msg00018.html (8,699 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] 1296 Digital (score: 1): Author: Al Wells <kb3sig@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 08:43:14 -0500; A few of us up here have also been talking about using a digital mode for weak signals on 1296 and up. Joe Taylor told one of my buddies that JT65 was our best bet. Most of the contest contacts on th; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-01/msg00022.html (8,583 bytes)
4. Re: [VHFcontesting] 1296 Digital (score: 1): Author: Mark Spencer <mark@alignedsolutions.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 10:12:49 -0800; I would generally agree with using JT65 (sub mode C) on 1296. That has worked ok for me in the past for long haul terrestrial use on 1296. That being said I'd probably be inclined to practice sending; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-01/msg00023.html (9,864 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]