Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+10\s+Meters\s+in\s+ARRL\s+VHF\s+Contests\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] 10 Meters in ARRL VHF Contests (score: 1)
Author: Les Rayburn <les@highnoonfilm.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 15:21:38 -0500
Really like Jack's suggestion. With the exception of few years out of a decade, 10 Meters performs more like 6 Meters than an HF band anyway. Another factor is that most solar scientists are predicti
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2013-09/msg00090.html (7,576 bytes)

2. Re: [VHFcontesting] 10 Meters in ARRL VHF Contests (score: 1)
Author: Dan Evans <k9zf@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 14:35:39 -0700 (PDT)
The last time I remember this topic coming up was a few years ago.  Funny how some of the topics cycle :-) At the time, several folks suggested that adding another "long propagation" band would hurt
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2013-09/msg00115.html (10,791 bytes)

3. Re: [VHFcontesting] 10 Meters in ARRL VHF Contests (score: 1)
Author: Les Rayburn <les@highnoonfilm.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 16:52:33 -0500
4 Meters would be awesome! Thought I guess it would take clearing up TV spectrum issues first--and we'd be limited to transverters (expect for that new Icom rig) for awhile, but it would sure make fo
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2013-09/msg00116.html (11,149 bytes)

4. Re: [VHFcontesting] 10 Meters in ARRL VHF Contests (score: 1)
Author: Doug MacKinnon <ve3gj@sympatico.ca>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 20:43:56 +0000
I do not believe adding more bands will help in any way ouside of making a bad situation worse by giving you more spectrum not to have qso's on. The key is lack of participation by the amateur commun
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2013-09/msg00135.html (8,065 bytes)

5. Re: [VHFcontesting] 10 Meters in ARRL VHF Contests (score: 1)
Author: "Mike (KA5CVH) Urich" <mike@ka5cvh.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 16:04:58 -0500
What the hell good is it giving us more spectrum when so few are using what we have already. Spend your time and efforts in an effort to get people to push those buttons and get on regardless of what
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2013-09/msg00137.html (9,727 bytes)

6. Re: [VHFcontesting] 10 Meters in ARRL VHF Contests (score: 1)
Author: "John Geiger" <af5cc@fidmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 17:05:57 -0500
I would definitely have to agree with us. Logic would tell us that there should be more participation on the VHF/UHF bands then there used to be, given the availablity and cost of all mode rigs combi
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2013-09/msg00138.html (9,031 bytes)

7. Re: [VHFcontesting] 10 Meters in ARRL VHF Contests (score: 1)
Author: Bob K0NR - email list <list@k0nr.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 18:43:50 -0600
I would definitely have to agree with us. Logic would tell us that there should be more participation on the VHF/UHF bands then there used to be, given the availablity and cost of all mode rigs combi
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2013-09/msg00140.html (8,739 bytes)

8. Re: [VHFcontesting] 10 Meters in ARRL VHF Contests (score: 1)
Author: Duane - N9DG <n9dg@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2013 05:34:34 -0700 (PDT)
would tell us that there should be more participation on the VHF/UHF bands then there used to be, given the availablity and cost of all mode rigs combining HF/6m/2m/70cm. Now 6m activity has really i
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2013-09/msg00141.html (9,356 bytes)

9. Re: [VHFcontesting] 10 Meters in ARRL VHF Contests (score: 1)
Author: beamar <beamar@aol.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2013 15:02:59 -0400
In response to this post and several others. That is absolutely right. Now the $64K question: How do we get them to push the button. Buddy WB4OMG Most new rigs of today have the vhf/uhf bands and mod
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2013-09/msg00142.html (8,244 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu