Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+\[VHF\]\s+Rovers\-Halo\'s\s+Vs\.\s+Loops\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] Rovers-Halo's Vs. Loops (score: 1)
Author: "Les Rayburn" <les@highnoonfilm.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 11:18:12 -0500
I'm glad to hear that I'm not the only one who has found that a 1/4 vertical compares very well to a loop, even with "ground wave" contacts. During the June contest, I took both a 6 Meter loop and a
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-07/msg00023.html (15,574 bytes)

2. Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] Rovers-Halo's Vs. Loops (score: 1)
Author: James Duffey <jamesduffey@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 09:41:21 -0600
There have been several good points made here. I run horizontal polarization in the rover, including a horizontal loop while roving. Here are some observations I have. With my horizontally polarized
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-07/msg00030.html (8,966 bytes)

3. Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] Rovers-Halo's Vs. Loops (score: 1)
Author: Dustin Williams <dustin@k5rnt.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2009 23:37:44 -0500
I recently changed from a 1/4 wave vertical mag mount on the top of the suv to an M2 loop mounted at the top of the receiver hitch mounted mast. I have to say the loop worked better for me with the e
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-07/msg00037.html (8,569 bytes)

4. Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] Rovers-Halo's Vs. Loops (score: 1)
Author: "Mike (KA5CVH) Urich" <ka5cvh@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 12:56:22 -0500
Mike asks And the url is ? ? ? -- Czar Mike Urich, KA5CVH You too can be a Czar http://www.czarofczarcasm.com/ http://ka5cvh.com http://twitter.com/KA5CVH CO2 is food for plants _____________________
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-07/msg00040.html (9,198 bytes)

5. Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] Rovers-Halo's Vs. Loops (score: 1)
Author: Dustin Williams <dustin@k5rnt.com>
Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2009 14:22:35 -0500
Sorry I must have had a brain fart. LOL www.k5rnt.com 73, Dustin K5RNT/R _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contestin
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-07/msg00041.html (6,930 bytes)

6. Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] Rovers-Halo's Vs. Loops (score: 1)
Author: Dustin Williams <dustin@k5rnt.com>
Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2009 15:17:06 -0500
Here are some closeups of the bulkhead. http://www.k5rnt.com/html/window_bulkhead.html _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://l
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-07/msg00043.html (10,736 bytes)

7. Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] Rovers-Halo's Vs. Loops (score: 1)
Author: "Mike (KA5CVH) Urich" <ka5cvh@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 08:31:07 -0500
Mike asks 1) Did Marshall charge you anything for the plans? <grin> http://ka5cvh.com/pictures/radio_pics/radio_k5qe_rover/ Specificly http://ka5cvh.com/pictures/radio_pics/radio_k5qe_rover/IMG_3165.
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-07/msg00048.html (10,496 bytes)

8. Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] Rovers-Halo's Vs. Loops (score: 1)
Author: Dustin Williams <dustin@k5rnt.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2009 14:32:06 -0500
Actually I have to give credit for the original design to Army AE5P. But I did have to make it a little "better". :-) No I didn't know about this but I do now. I like this a lot. Good job. __________
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-07/msg00054.html (10,701 bytes)

9. Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] Rovers-Halo's Vs. Loops (score: 1)
Author: Steve Clifford <k4gun.r@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 14:59:59 -0400
I sent in a half dozen spots to N2MH last year with notes and none have appeared. I don't think he's updating the site at all right now. Steve K4GUN/R _______________________________________________
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-07/msg00055.html (10,238 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu