Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+\[VHF\]\s+LOTW\s+incentive\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+\[VHF\]\s+LOTW\s+incentive\.\.\.\s*$/: 1 ]

Total 1 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] LOTW incentive... (score: 1): Author: Glen Overby <goverby@charter.net>; Date: Mon, 4, Feb, 2008 5:7:35 -0000; I agree about the dismal support. A year ago I loaded my January VHF+ contest logs (as a rover -- splitting out the locations was a pain) and found that tqsl would not accept QSOs on 902mhz! I experi; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-02/msg00017.html (7,821 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 1
Page: [1]