Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+\[VHF\]\s+An\s+apology\s+to\s+Division\s+Director\s+Greg\s+Sarratt\,\s+W4OZK\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+\[VHF\]\s+An\s+apology\s+to\s+Division\s+Director\s+Greg\s+Sarratt\,\s+W4OZK\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] An apology to Division Director Greg Sarratt, W4OZK (score: 1): Author: Crownhaven <crownhaven@bellsouth.net>; Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 15:40:27 -0500; Well, the way I see it is you don't owe anyone an apology. He should have let you know what he was doing on your behalf. If he took umbrage to the fact that you mentioned he hadn't had the courtesy t; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2013-07/msg00066.html (8,866 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] An apology to Division Director Greg Sarratt, W4OZK (score: 1): Author: Les Rayburn <les@highnoonfilm.com>; Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 23:53:51 -0500; Let me be clear. Greg did not take umbrage to my complaints, and did apologize in private for not letting me know what actions he was taking in regard to concerns voiced here on the reflectors. Greg; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2013-07/msg00069.html (10,888 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] An apology to Division Director Greg Sarratt, W4OZK (score: 1): Author: James Duffey <jamesduffey@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 17:36:12 -0600; Les - I think it is big of you to apologize and the right thing. Good for you. The bigger question though, and one you should ask Greg the next time you see him, is now that the VUAC has been allowed; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2013-07/msg00071.html (12,156 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]