Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+\[TowerTalk\]\s+PL\s+259\s+crimp\s+connectors\s+for\s+RG\s+400\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+\[TowerTalk\]\s+PL\s+259\s+crimp\s+connectors\s+for\s+RG\s+400\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [VHFcontesting] [TowerTalk] PL 259 crimp connectors for RG 400 (score: 1): Author: "Jeff DePolo" <jd0@broadsci.com>; Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2016 15:11:37 -0400; I don't specifically buy "generic" connectors, but of all of the PL-259 crimp connectors for 0.195" OD coax that I've used, trying to put them on a cable with a stranded center conductor like RG400; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2016-06/msg00030.html (8,722 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] [TowerTalk] PL 259 crimp connectors for RG 400 (score: 1): Author: Mark Spencer <mark@alignedsolutions.com>; Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 14:45:26 -0700; Thanks Jeff. I think your answer summarized the issue I am having. I'm beginning to wonder if the prior batches of connectors that "worked" may have been slightly over sized or perhaps as you mention; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2016-06/msg00032.html (9,936 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]