Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Trlog\]\s+Winkeyer\s+support\s+in\s+0\.53\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Trlog\]\s+Winkeyer\s+support\s+in\s+0\.53\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Trlog] Winkeyer support in 0.53 (score: 1): Author: Martin Kratoska <martin@ok1rr.com>; Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2022 20:15:43 +0200; The Winkeyer support in 0.53 is still defective. Testing on WK 3.1 built into microHAM DXP. Comparisons made with CQRlog which does all perfectly without any unwanted side effects. fpc sources are he; /archives//html/TRLog/2022-08/msg00004.html (8,119 bytes)
2. Re: [Trlog] Winkeyer support in 0.53 (score: 1): Author: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>; Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2022 20:10:00 +0000; I am sorry to hear this is still not working for you. As you might recall - neither I nor W9CF could replicate this using our Winkeyers or other keyers we have avaliable. I tried both the sidetone is; /archives//html/TRLog/2022-08/msg00005.html (8,276 bytes)
3. Re: [Trlog] Winkeyer support in 0.53 (score: 1): Author: Martin Kratoska <martin@ok1rr.com>; Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2022 11:28:40 +0200; Testing on the Lubuntu 22.04.1 LTS (jammy), 64 bit Tested also with two other keyers, WK 2.3 compatible (K3NG code) - the same results. Tested my trlog compiled from the sources and also the prebuilt; /archives//html/TRLog/2022-08/msg00006.html (9,764 bytes)
4. Re: [Trlog] Winkeyer support in 0.53 (score: 1): Author: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>; Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2022 13:42:05 +0000; Yes, that seems strange. Are these all on the same computer? Can you try this on more than one computer? I really am trying to understand. There are two of us here that have tried this in the past an; /archives//html/TRLog/2022-08/msg00007.html (8,055 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]