Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+INRAD\s+filter\s+for\s+OMNI\s+VI\/Plus\s+series\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+INRAD\s+filter\s+for\s+OMNI\s+VI\/Plus\s+series\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] INRAD filter for OMNI VI/Plus series (score: 1): Author: Jim Miller <k4sqr@juno.com>; Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 06:57:18 -0400; for 2-3 months: International Radio roofing Filters Preliminary Information: Tone Spacing Dynamic Range More than 3 kHz 101 dB 3 kHz 98.8 dB (They were taking orders for similar FT-1000MP filters at; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00521.html (7,489 bytes)
2. [TenTec] INRAD filter for OMNI VI/Plus series (score: 1): Author: "Dave Bowker" <dbowker@mail.sjv.net>; Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 08:22:09 -0400; I can personally confirm that W2VJM (Inrad) is working full-time on the OMNI VI+ mod., and I assure it will be worth waiting for. For an indication of the IP3 DR performance improvement that [can] be; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00614.html (7,977 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] INRAD filter for OMNI VI/Plus series (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Kelly" <jkelly@bellatlantic.net>; Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 22:01:29 -0400; Dave, Will this require the VI plus or will a VI orVI/opt1 be ok? Jeff KT2K OMNI _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00619.html (7,658 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] INRAD filter for OMNI VI/Plus series (score: 1): Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>; Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 09:33:15 -0700; Hi Dave (and the group) - I made some similar mods to some of my older Kenwood gear to good advantage, but I lose the Noise Blanker in the process. I don't have my schematic handy, does the NB sample; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00658.html (8,051 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]