Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Topband\:\s+Another\s+source\s+of\s+160\s+meter\s+RFI\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Topband\:\s+Another\s+source\s+of\s+160\s+meter\s+RFI\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RFI] Topband: Another source of 160 meter RFI (score: 1): Author: donovanf@starpower.net; Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:36:45 -0400 (EDT); Before we get too euphoric about the FCC's performance in this matter, this is the text of an email sent to me today by the ham directly affected by this RFI: "So this is the third letter, and a visi; /archives//html/Topband/2013-04/msg00050.html (9,267 bytes)
2. Re: [RFI] Topband: Another source of 160 meter RFI (score: 1): Author: "Mike Ryan" <mryan001@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:48:39 -0400; I have two words for you.... WIRE CUTTERS. - m --Original Message-- From: donovanf@starpower.net Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 7:36 PM To: topband ; rfi Cc: W2PM Subject: Re: [RFI] Topband: Another; /archives//html/Topband/2013-04/msg00051.html (9,672 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]