Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:wa7vni@dayshaw.net: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Portable 160M Antenna Options (score: 1)
Author: "WA7VNI" <wa7vni@dayshaw.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 10:48:12 -0800
Hi All, I've been playing around with the idea of trying the next 160 M contest from a portable location. Here's the deal. Any thoughts on the installation described below will be appreciated. I can
/archives//html/Topband/2003-11/msg00166.html (8,742 bytes)

2. RE: Topband: Portable 160M Antenna Options (score: 1)
Author: "WA7VNI" <wa7vni@dayshaw.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 12:47:22 -0800
I guess I should have mentioned that the reason I wanted to try the portable operation was to have a better 160M antenna/ground than the small dipole with the openwire feedline shorted and fed as a l
/archives//html/Topband/2003-11/msg00167.html (7,852 bytes)

3. RE: Topband: dx window (score: 1)
Author: "WA7VNI" <wa7vni@dayshaw.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 18:10:00 -0800
Nicely stated Tom. Your sentiments bring back memories of *The Amateur's Code* that used to appear in the front of every ARRL publication. I seem to remember words like considerate, loyal, progressiv
/archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00314.html (9,517 bytes)

4. RE: Topband: 160m int L (score: 1)
Author: "WA7VNI" <wa7vni@dayshaw.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 20:11:05 -0800
Gregg, Rather than go with the *traditional L* you might want to consider a *Top Fed L*. W4RNL has all the data you need on his site here: http://www.cebik.com/radio.html The specific article on Top
/archives//html/Topband/2004-01/msg00053.html (8,316 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu