Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:wa4dou@juno.com: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Topband: spots and messy pileups (score: 1)
Author: wa4dou@juno.com
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:12:08 GMT
As regards spotting, I don't like it and I don't use it. I believe in the old adage " listen, listen, listen." Spotting reminds me of some deer hunters who surround an large area and use dogs and CB
/archives//html/Topband/2004-02/msg00288.html (7,190 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: KH6ZM Pileup and Operating Manners (score: 1)
Author: wa4dou@juno.com
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:22:11 GMT
I believe the individual is solely responsible for his/her behavior and that no lack of "guidance" from the dx station can be properly blamed for producing bad behavior. It stems from a lack of self
/archives//html/Topband/2004-02/msg00289.html (8,253 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: kh6zm pileup (score: 1)
Author: wa4dou@juno.com
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:32:31 GMT
The necessity for lecturing would disappear if the dx world became serious about "disfellowshipping" those who repeatedly went out of their way to practice selfish tactics. __________________________
/archives//html/Topband/2004-02/msg00291.html (6,983 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Questionable cluster use (score: 1)
Author: Roy D Lincoln <wa4dou@juno.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 06:42:00 -0500
Why not join those of us who believe dx should only be available to those who do the work of listening for it and shun the dx posting completely. It would have a very positive effect,no doubt. Share
/archives//html/Topband/2004-02/msg00318.html (7,289 bytes)

5. RE: Topband: MF Anti-Podal Propagation Enhancement (score: 1)
Author: wa4dou@juno.com
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 20:48:47 GMT
Interestingly, the only time I was ever told by stateside stations that my 20 meter signals were equally strong on all azimuths was in late April or early May,1968. My ship was just offshore of 3B9.
/archives//html/Topband/2004-03/msg00340.html (7,537 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: Re: 1837.5 KC/1845 KC CW QRM (score: 1)
Author: Roy D Lincoln <wa4dou@juno.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 21:47:11 -0400
As an amateur licensee of 43 years, I have only recently become aware that there are those who believe that having not been a party to various gentlemen's agreements, they are not bound by such. I ma
/archives//html/Topband/2004-04/msg00167.html (9,558 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: Re: 1837.5 KC/1845 KC CW QRM (score: 1)
Author: Roy D Lincoln <wa4dou@juno.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 23:20:05 -0400
Bill, I'm not much for phone operation, but I understand and agree that 1843 khz. is the lower limit that one should set their vfo to when operating LSB. That is what I was thinking even though makin
/archives//html/Topband/2004-04/msg00173.html (11,113 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: LU5WW QSL Route? (score: 1)
Author: "wa4dou@juno.com" <wa4dou@juno.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 19:26:22 GMT
Jeff, I'm sure it doesn't help, but we all have the same problem at various times with some qsl's. It helps to remember that our standings in DXCC and other endeavors mean little in the grand scheme
/archives//html/Topband/2004-06/msg00080.html (7,027 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: Switch for 160 meter antenna (score: 1)
Author: "wa4dou@juno.com" <wa4dou@juno.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 00:02:24 GMT
Ken, Thats potentially an awful high voltage to be switching with a relay or switch. I think I'd rather use a trap, or even better, use the entire length of the antenna on both 80 and 160, assuming i
/archives//html/Topband/2004-07/msg00034.html (7,246 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: Receivers (score: 1)
Author: "wa4dou@juno.com" <wa4dou@juno.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 15:03:46 GMT
We'll be sorry one day when all our natural resources are to be found in the landfills, that we ever accepted "planned obsolescence". I can repair SMT gear but now a lot of it is being assembled with
/archives//html/Topband/2004-11/msg00099.html (8,429 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu