Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:wa3mej@comcast.net: 67 ]

Total 67 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: 160M Beverage antenna help requested (score: 1)
Author: wa3mej@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 20:56:57 +0000 (UTC)
Good afternoon to ALL! I am getting ready to put up a beverage for top band.  I have decided that I want to put up a two wire system using window line because of the ease of assembly.  I am not sure
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00033.html (7,297 bytes)

2. Topband: HOLY COW.. what price copper !! (score: 1)
Author: wa3mej@comcast.net
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 22:38:59 +0000 (UTC)
For the last 40 plus years now I have been using copper water pipe as part of my ground system. Since my old pipe had eroded , coroded and otherwise deteriorated I decided to remove it and install a
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00084.html (8,178 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Inverted L antennas. (score: 1)
Author: wa3mej@comcast.net
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 22:49:48 +0000 (UTC)
I use an inverted L here but it goes to within 6 inches of the ground.  total length is about 160ft with about 70 vertical.  I use a homebrew variable cap to match it.  My radials are 4 loaded radial
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00085.html (7,691 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Inverted L antennas. (score: 1)
Author: wa3mej@comcast.net
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 03:13:43 +0000 (UTC)
Jerry,   I started with one radial.. and added inductance here the radial connected to the base of the antenna.. wish I remembered what valuee I used .. but I dont. then trimmed the radial I had pre
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00087.html (9,323 bytes)

5. Topband: Location of beverage close to 60 ft hill (score: 1)
Author: wa3mej@comcast.net
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 23:59:53 +0000 (UTC)
OK,   After surveying my property and getting permission from the neighbor to use his property I have decided that in order to get a beverage pointed to about 35 - 45 deg. (from MD) and keep the beve
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00125.html (7,863 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: Location of beverage close to 60 ft hill (score: 1)
Author: wa3mej@comcast.net
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 20:57:51 +0000 (UTC)
Tom,   I only have about 491 ft of window line and thats what I am using for the two direction beverage. Placement is in part dictated by the hill but mostly the rationalle for the 300 or so feet fro
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00138.html (12,814 bytes)

7. Topband: Groujd to Beverage or Beverage to ground (score: 1)
Author: wa3mej@comcast.net
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 17:51:08 +0000 (UTC)
Ok.. the window line is run in as straight of a line as I gan manage.. wow what a bunch of brush in the back 40! Now for the big question... Is it better to mount the transformer near the ground stak
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00228.html (6,816 bytes)

8. Topband: Beverage up but maybe has problems comments requested (score: 1)
Author: wa3mej@comcast.net
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 03:31:42 +0000 (UTC)
OK    the Beverage is up, transformers installed, and coax hooked up. Let me refresh everyone memory   -   I put up a 490 ft window line beverage which turns out to be headed 30deg magnetic (best I c
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00010.html (8,117 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: Beverage up but maybe has problems comments requested (score: 1)
Author: wa3mej@comcast.net
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 19:24:25 +0000 (UTC)
George,   Thanks for taking the time reply.. and yes you understand.. like I told another respondee its about technical excellence and understanding !  Ya gotta understand why your doing something. M
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00016.html (16,064 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: Beverage up but maybe has problems comments requested (score: 1)
Author: wa3mej@comcast.net
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 19:31:46 +0000 (UTC)
Gary,   Yep.. it applies to reactance.. but I am not quite sure that the 1:1 is working  and I need to run the swr curve on the antenna to verify if it is correct or not.  I agree it was a little har
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00019.html (10,607 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: Topband Digest, Vol 108, Issue 37 (score: 1)
Author: wa3mej@comcast.net
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 23:54:36 +0000 (UTC)
Gary, I had this problem once when I used the wrong connections.. the ones I had were for RG-59 instead of RG-6 Check carefully they look alike if unsure get new ones Jim Message: 2 Date: Mon, 12 Dec
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00293.html (7,831 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: Topband Digest, Vol 108, Issue 80 (score: 1)
Author: wa3mej@comcast.net
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 01:33:15 +0000 (UTC)
Tom, I have been w atching the spotting networks lately.   I think much of the problem is that many stations now use directional antennas what with all the Flag, Pennant and K9AY antennas now being u
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00577.html (8,409 bytes)

13. Re: Topband: digital on 1838 +/- (score: 1)
Author: wa3mej@comcast.net
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2011 03:47:23 +0000 (UTC)
Tree, Thanks for clarifying your position... like many I dont want to be censored and I promise not to assisanate too many characters. First of all I love CW.. I was a navy radioman and I enjoy CW go
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00625.html (30,802 bytes)

14. Re: Topband: Topband Digest, Vol 109, Issue 1 (score: 1)
Author: wa3mej@comcast.net
Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2012 18:54:10 +0000 (UTC)
Jose: I have been a ham for a long while having seen the transition from tube to transistorized rigs. Although I have an amp the only time I find it necessary is when working DX on 160 much of the re
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00005.html (42,419 bytes)

15. Topband: Beverage working (score: 1)
Author: wa3mej@comcast.net
Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2012 21:52:40 +0000 (UTC)
Gentleman,   Happy New Year. I want to take this time to let everyone know that my efforts to install a Beverage have met with success and thank all those who took the time to aid in my efforts. One
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00009.html (18,051 bytes)

16. Topband: Preventing QRM (score: 1)
Author: wa3mej@comcast.net
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 22:02:30 +0000 (UTC)
Brian, I currently have a very high power line noise (the electric company is trying to find it) that is why I mostly use a techique I call scan and pounce (at my age I cant pounce too hard though) w
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00160.html (9,823 bytes)

17. Topband: Ticked over intentional interference on top band (score: 1)
Author: wa3mej@comcast.net
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 03:01:30 +0000 (UTC)
I have been a ham for almost 46 years now and having been on 160 off an on for much of that time. Tonight I saw something that I had not really seen on 160 and kinda ticked me off big time; some idio
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00215.html (7,964 bytes)

18. Re: Topband: Ticked over intentional interference on top band (score: 1)
Author: wa3mej@comcast.net
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 01:48:52 +0000 (UTC)
Geee guys,  I would be sorry I even made the original post except that no matter how bad a stations signal is technically that is no reason to intentionally jam him.  It is just plain stupid you will
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00247.html (8,726 bytes)

19. Topband: LOTW Participation (score: 1)
Author: wa3mej@comcast.net
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 00:27:34 +0000 (UTC)
This has probably already been asked on here.. geeze I hope it doesnt start another gripefest.  But I am wondering with the cost of QSL cards, postage etc Why dont more people working DX (especially
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00243.html (7,075 bytes)

20. Topband: LOTW Responses (score: 1)
Author: wa3mej@comcast.net
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 15:34:31 +0000 (UTC)
I have been reading the responses to my previous post on LOTW and find some of them curiously interesting. First I am at a point in my life that I wont want any more clutter.  Second and more importa
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00259.html (9,640 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu