Mail Archive Search: <+from:w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com: 149 ]

Total 149 documents matching your query.

21. TopBand: Re: FO0EEN on 160 (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom); Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1998 04:07:33 -0500; I worked him at 0825Z this morning. He was 559, maybe a little light but still good copy. He's definitely on and workable. 73 Tom -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/topband.html Submissions: t; /archives//html/Topband/1998-12/msg00215.html (6,507 bytes)
22. TopBand: FT1000D Aux RX input (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom); Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1998 22:25:53 -0500; Ken, There is a secondary problem. Even if you don't damage parts, many radios do not have enough antenna port isolation and the receive antenna will couple back into the low level transmitter stages; /archives//html/Topband/1998-12/msg00226.html (7,976 bytes)
23. TopBand: RE: Poor 160 Conditions (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom); Date: Thu, 24 Dec 1998 13:50:10 -0500; I think Art has the answer. On the recent poor nights to Europe, moving up 40 and even 20 is wide open to the normal 160 path. As the solar flux goes up, I always expect 160 to suffer. It is, however; /archives//html/Topband/1998-12/msg00239.html (7,938 bytes)
24. TopBand: InRad FT1000MP Mod: Good for 160? (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom); Date: Fri, 25 Dec 1998 08:03:43 -0500; Hi Ty, the My this My regular FT-1000 suffers from too much gain ahead of the narrow filters in the lower IF's, particularly on 160 meters. I don't know how the MP compares, but the last thing the re; /archives//html/Topband/1998-12/msg00246.html (8,224 bytes)
25. TopBand: RE: Poor 160 Conditions (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom); Date: Fri, 25 Dec 1998 08:13:52 -0500; Hi Bob, Everything I've read indicates signal levels drop as frequency is moved further below the MUF, and the strongest signals occur just below the MUF. It is in the Antenna Engineering Handbook se; /archives//html/Topband/1998-12/msg00247.html (8,796 bytes)
26. TopBand: 1830 BCB QRM (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom); Date: Fri, 25 Dec 1998 23:33:58 -0500; Off and on for the past few weeks, I'm pretty sure WDOD in Chattanooga has been popping up on various places in the 160 band. It was up around 1900 kHz last week. My only verification is the fact tha; /archives//html/Topband/1998-12/msg00253.html (7,220 bytes)
27. TopBand: RE: Poor 160 Conditions (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom); Date: Fri, 25 Dec 1998 23:02:42 -0500; Hi Bob, Thanks for the reply. I can see I must read something into the text I have that isn't really what goes on. Hopefully you can help with one more question. This stuff is hard to follow. That mu; /archives//html/Topband/1998-12/msg00257.html (8,357 bytes)
28. TopBand: 1000MP RX (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom); Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1998 09:49:45 -0500; I hope Bill doesn't mind this post, but this does apply to 160 meters. There are a lot of FT1000's in use. 160 meters always requires exceptional dynamic range when DX signals are weak and the band i; /archives//html/Topband/1998-12/msg00298.html (8,606 bytes)
29. TopBand: Grid Square Look up site? (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom); Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1998 12:19:10 -0500; I have a question. YV1NX gave me his QTH and ASKED me to look up his grid square for him. I sent his grid square to him since he had no idea what it was and how to look it up. HR1LW also informed me; /archives//html/Topband/1998-12/msg00299.html (8,850 bytes)
30. TopBand: FT-1000 mod (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom); Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1998 17:24:34 -0500; This mod greatly improves strong signal IMD in the FT-1000. I used a two kHz test spacing in the measurements, so the 12 kHz wide 70 MHz first IF filter did not make results look artificially better.; /archives//html/Topband/1998-12/msg00314.html (8,720 bytes)
31. TopBand: FT-1000 mod (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom); Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1998 09:25:52 -0500; Just to clarify this: My rig is a FT1000, which is the same (less some options) as a 1000D electrically. I think the FT-1000's are very different than the 1000MP. Sorry for any confusion. 73, Tom --; /archives//html/Topband/1998-12/msg00341.html (6,670 bytes)
32. TopBand: BC Hash (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom); Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1998 10:56:50 -0500; I've gotten some input but I'm still asking for help from anyone who hears BC hash around 1830, in particular if they hear it really strong. It comes and goes, sometimes off for long periods. It soun; /archives//html/Topband/1998-12/msg00342.html (7,085 bytes)
33. TopBand: Inverted-L (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom); Date: Sun, 01 Nov 1998 07:24:33 -0500; Hi Russ, I've had dozens of Inverted L's. They always seem to work about the same no matter how long the are, as long as they are between 130 and 170 feet long. Longer than that, and they quickly bec; /archives//html/Topband/1998-11/msg00002.html (7,015 bytes)
34. TopBand: The following day....! (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom); Date: Sun, 01 Nov 1998 07:36:10 -0500; To: <topband@contesting.com> Hi Mike, I called you a few times, but every time you faded out. QSB was bad here also. 8Q7IO had the same QSB, and we have the same QRM problems stateside you do. Right; /archives//html/Topband/1998-11/msg00003.html (7,578 bytes)
35. TopBand: G5RV 'T' (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom); Date: Sun, 08 Nov 1998 15:01:50 -0500; Hi Bob, We should be very careful assuming we have "knocked the ground loss problem" by measuring the feedpoint impedance, particularly in a resonant counterpoise. Not all losses show as an "ohm for; /archives//html/Topband/1998-11/msg00048.html (8,371 bytes)
36. TopBand: s/n (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom); Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1998 22:24:43 -0500; Hi Bob, with a Depends on where the noise is coming from Bob. If the noise primarily comes from one direction, you want maximum signal-direction to noise-direction ratio in the pattern. If the noise; /archives//html/Topband/1998-11/msg00141.html (8,414 bytes)
37. TopBand: XZ1N (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom); Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1998 23:27:04 -0500; They were 349 at about 1200Z on 160 meters, 1831 KHz. 73 Tom -- To: <topband@contesting.com> -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/topband.html Submissions: topband@contesting.com Administrative r; /archives//html/Topband/1998-11/msg00142.html (8,436 bytes)
38. TopBand: Re: Receiving antennas and feedlines (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom); Date: Thu, 01 Oct 1998 11:06:36 -0400; Hi Paul, If the loop is shielded and if the shield is properly connected, it cures the common mode problems. What happens is the shield becomes the actual antenna element that receives the signal (bo; /archives//html/Topband/1998-10/msg00003.html (8,919 bytes)
39. TopBand: FB long haul condx (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom); Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1998 11:10:06 -0400; YB0ARA was on with a fairly good signal (louder than the VK's), but we were plagued again with QRN well over S9. Propagation has been odd the last month. VK and ZL propagation is better just after or; /archives//html/Topband/1998-10/msg00006.html (7,633 bytes)
40. TopBand: Re: Loops and preamplifiers (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom); Date: Mon, 05 Oct 1998 11:14:30 -0400; Hi Peter, The scope of this is beyond what is possible in one page "reflector posting", but I'd like to make an important point. I've used loop arrays on 160 for well over twenty years now, the first; /archives//html/Topband/1998-10/msg00021.html (9,842 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]