Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w8car@buckeye-express.com: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Noisy dimmer switches and RFI (score: 1)
Author: w8car@buckeye-express.com (DAN KOVATCH)
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2002 06:37:24 -0500
I had this problem when I first moved into my home in 1993. I replaced about 3 dimmers. ALL dimmers SHOULD be RFI proofed. Go to Lowes or Home Depot and buy good quality dimmers with metal enclosures
/archives//html/Topband/2002-03/msg00058.html (7,572 bytes)

2. Topband: ewe (score: 1)
Author: w8car@buckeye-express.com (DAN KOVATCH)
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 16:17:25 -0500
http://www.fcc.gov/mmb/asd/amq.html#sprung4 will take you to the FCC AM database lookup page. I always check my EWEs (or any listening ant) at night. During the day they seem to have little F/B but a
/archives//html/Topband/2002-01/msg00200.html (7,314 bytes)

3. Topband: condx and comments 12/28 (score: 1)
Author: w8car@buckeye-express.com (DAN KOVATCH)
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 08:54:55 -0500
Greetings and best wishes to TPers Heard EA3VY , Jose, very early on 160 (2200 about) so decided to watch the band. Signals became legible at about 0430 and I wrked first QSO @ 0448. The band then se
/archives//html/Topband/2001-12/msg00131.html (7,735 bytes)

4. Topband: 160 condx last night feb/4/04 (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Kovatch" <w8car@buckeye-express.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 14:00:12 -0500
I hope this doesn't detract from the discussions of clicks, noise floor, S9 definitions or radio bashing but I actually could not sleep last night and wandered into the shack. The packetcluster scree
/archives//html/Topband/2004-02/msg00082.html (7,520 bytes)

5. Topband: Condx last night and this am (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Kovatch" <w8car@buckeye-express.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:32:06 -0500
Greetings of the season, In Ohio last night (Monday) was hearing and working EU before my sundown. Several I, G and GM stations were coming through. The band then seemed to fade down to nothing at ar
/archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00334.html (7,328 bytes)

6. Topband: elevated radial/ground radial question (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Kovatch" <w8car@buckeye-express.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 10:42:34 -0500
Happy New Year, I have been using an Inverted L with 3 elevated radials for over 10 years with good success. No ground radials-yet. I have recently reread all I can find on the tradeoffs with this ap
/archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00415.html (7,543 bytes)

7. Topband: Elevated vs ground radials update (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Kovatch" <w8car@buckeye-express.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 13:12:28 -0500
First, thanks to all who responded via the list and off list about whether adding ground radials would help with 3 elevated radials. The consensus was adding ground radials under elevated radials was
/archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00094.html (7,582 bytes)

8. Topband: Condx 1/11/06 -Castalia Chronicle (apologies to the BoringReport) (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Kovatch" <w8car@buckeye-express.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:09:41 -0500
In a break with discussion of RMs and whether split frequency is a PC idea this is a report on band condx last night. During 0413Z to 0719 Z I worked 32 different stations in 16 different countries l
/archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00146.html (7,309 bytes)

9. Topband: Cold Creek report (with deference to the Boring report) (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Kovatch" <w8car@buckeye-express.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 02:13:42 -0500
It is frozen (solid) here in beauteous Ohio so I checked the bands at 1100 PM local before turning in and found 160 to be good shape. I wrked a total of 34 stations (list of prefixes below) over the
/archives//html/Topband/2007-02/msg00039.html (7,714 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Green Power Lightbulb QRN (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Kovatch" <w8car@buckeye-express.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 13:05:19 -0400
I have replaced several lights with the neon 'Greenie Lights' and so far have noticed no ill effects. We have several 3 ways also and most of the others are in single fixtures, including two in the s
/archives//html/Topband/2007-10/msg00195.html (10,672 bytes)

11. Topband: 160 last night and this AM - Castalia report (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Kovatch" <w8car@buckeye-express.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 08:31:01 -0500
Condx were unusually quiet here last night. No street lights, car ignitions, hums or squeeks. The band was very alive with EU but not huge signals-seems like I could work anyone I could hr including
/archives//html/Topband/2008-01/msg00039.html (7,362 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: Ground Radials & Multi-Element Antennas (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Kovatch" <w8car@buckeye-express.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 09:54:23 -0500
If the purpose of ground radials is to reduce ground loss then it stands to reason that more is better. I have always tied ground radial systems together and there IS evidence to support this in less
/archives//html/Topband/2009-11/msg00170.html (8,766 bytes)

13. Topband: ground rod replacement? (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Kovatch" <w8car@buckeye-express.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 16:42:54 -0400
I'm in the process of getting some of the 'stealth' receive antennas ready for the season and noticed one of the ground rods that I use on the BOG was very built up with crude and detritus. There was
/archives//html/Topband/2010-09/msg00070.html (6,906 bytes)

14. Re: Topband: Boring Report - December (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Kovatch" <w8car@buckeye-express.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 11:55:33 -0500
Tree, I would agree with your assessment. The band in beautiful downtown Ohio has been flat this season. The regulars that are the beacons from EU have been scarce or non existent. I have had several
/archives//html/Topband/2011-01/msg00013.html (9,090 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] Topband: your opinion about ICE RF limiter (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Kovatch" <w8car@buckeye-express.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 22:16:22 -0400
I have used one for many years and it saved the front end of a TS 830s when an elevated radial drooped and touched a beverage antenna. I have used it on my FT1000mp since 1993 with no failures or add
/archives//html/Topband/2011-03/msg00081.html (8,522 bytes)

16. Re: Topband: How Good is Good Enough? (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Kovatch" <w8car@buckeye-express.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 07:29:50 -0400
I'm in Carl's camp. Both my Bogs are shorter at about 350 feet but one was once over 500 and worked fine (had to shorten due to 'development of real estate'. I terminate at 270 ohms and wind xfrms fo
/archives//html/Topband/2012-03/msg00034.html (10,307 bytes)

17. Re: Topband: Inverted L improvement question (score: 1)
Author: "Dan" <w8car@buckeye-express.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 15:45:32 -0500
One thing to remember is that one night on topband is not enough to judge an antenna. Condx are to variable to compare from one night to the next. Any antenna on 160 with about 70 or more vertical fe
/archives//html/Topband/2018-12/msg00179.html (8,641 bytes)

18. Topband: 160 status this am (score: 1)
Author: "Dan" <w8car@buckeye-express.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 13:25:07 -0500
Having hooked my inverted L yesterday I woke early (not on purpose) so grabbed some coffee and turned on the radio. I could hear JA from Ohio on the Hi-Z an hour before my sunrise. Called a few times
/archives//html/Topband/2019-11/msg00083.html (6,984 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu