Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w7iuv: 193 ] [ at (Too many documents hit. Ignored) ] [ arrl.net: 33 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Re: 160 Meters Mobile Antennas (score: 176)
Author: w7iuv at arrl.net (Larry Molitor)
Date: Sun May 11 17:40:51 2003
W9UCW's post brought back a lot of memories. I could write a book about topband mobile'ing around the south side of Chicago in the early 60's! Instead, I'll offer a few things I've learned in the las
/archives//html/Topband/2003-05/msg00088.html (10,302 bytes)

2. Topband: Re: 160 Loaded Vertical Antennas (Barry, W9UCW) (score: 176)
Author: w7iuv at arrl.net (Larry Molitor)
Date: Sat May 17 21:59:35 2003
In response to Mike, Bruce, and others: There seems to be a trend towards forgetting the physical dimensions of the loading scheme in question. I'd like to caution those trying to wrap their mind aro
/archives//html/Topband/2003-05/msg00119.html (9,860 bytes)

3. Topband: front to back? (score: 176)
Author: w7iuv at arrl.net (Larry Molitor)
Date: Sun May 25 16:12:44 2003
Barry, A while back I evaluated the flag, pennant, diamond, and delta, as well as the K9AY. Of all of them the delta configuration consistently produced the poorest performance. It was the most susce
/archives//html/Topband/2003-05/msg00146.html (8,069 bytes)

4. Topband: Pennants, flags, etc. (score: 176)
Author: w7iuv at arrl.net (Larry Molitor)
Date: Sat Apr 5 11:13:20 2003
Barry, With a couple hundred hours of A/B testing of Flags, Pennants, Deltas, Diamonds, K9AY's, and short Beverages on a 2 acre urban lot, I tell you that a Rotatable Flag is the best compromise. You
/archives//html/Topband/2003-04/msg00008.html (7,308 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu