Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w2pm@aol.com: 320 ]

Total 320 documents matching your query.

281. Re: Topband: LOTW (score: 1)
Author: W2PM <w2pm@aol.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 13:21:30 -0500
You won't be able to do that. You have to install a key on that pc altho I think you can email your log updates to LOTW. Not sure abt that. Sent from my iPhone _______________________________________
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00275.html (9,943 bytes)

282. Re: Topband: LOTW Participation (score: 1)
Author: W2PM <w2pm@aol.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 13:25:58 -0500
Some of the dxpeditions are allowing u to request a qsl on line with a PayPal fee as an option of sending thru the mail. Its been very reasonable and efficient to me when the option is there. I am al
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00276.html (11,122 bytes)

283. Re: Topband: LOTW Responses (score: 1)
Author: W2PM <w2pm@aol.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 13:31:13 -0500
Where eQSL has been useful to me is the QSo's I didn't have in my pc log from 5 years ago when I had a paper log. I then see which of those I needed and it turned out many were in LOTW too and I just
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00277.html (7,035 bytes)

284. Re: Topband: Wellbrook receive loop performance (score: 1)
Author: W2PM <w2pm@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:23:05 -0400
A comparison of the Wellbrook product which is a magnetic loop is not a good one to a AY loop or other low angle directive receive antenna. Mag loops are not "directive" in the same way they only hav
/archives//html/Topband/2012-04/msg00083.html (10,440 bytes)

285. Re: Topband: Wellbrook receive loop performance (score: 1)
Author: W2PM <w2pm@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:24:06 -0400
BCB work would be good for the Wellbrook and I suspect that is their target market. Sent from my iPad _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
/archives//html/Topband/2012-04/msg00084.html (11,934 bytes)

286. Re: Topband: Wellbrook receive loop performance (score: 1)
Author: W2PM <w2pm@aol.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:07:31 -0400
I get that Eddy. But I've been there and done that in this small, noisy suburban non 160 friendly QTH. I've worked VK with a mag loop and they are worth having if u can afford the space to share with
/archives//html/Topband/2012-04/msg00096.html (11,090 bytes)

287. Re: Topband: Small loop Performance (score: 1)
Author: W2PM <w2pm@aol.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 10:00:55 -0400
I think a key success factor is for us to get past the magic and wives tales and look at the fundementals. What is the local situation wrt local crud noise, how localized or generalized is it, what a
/archives//html/Topband/2012-04/msg00102.html (14,529 bytes)

288. Re: Topband: Wellbrook receive loop performance (score: 1)
Author: W2PM <w2pm@aol.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 10:00:04 -0400
Don. No doubt mag loop is far less sensitive to interaction than the flag or pennants where metal objects within 50 ft will certainly distort the pattern. Mostly the foward lobe but modelling and obs
/archives//html/Topband/2012-04/msg00106.html (14,165 bytes)

289. Re: Topband: Home Depot LED bulb interference. (score: 1)
Author: W2PM <w2pm@aol.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 10:12:00 -0400
Wait until the next administration of the current incumbent US President. Dont worry Herb you will be paying a lot more for energy soon enough. Sent from my iPhone ___________________________________
/archives//html/Topband/2012-04/msg00160.html (10,451 bytes)

290. Re: Topband: Fwd: radals fer 160m vertcal (score: 1)
Author: W2PM <w2pm@aol.com>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 11:08:39 -0400
The real problem it seems people can't read the several straightforward factual literature which is out there. If their own situation doesn't exact fit the examples in text it seems to create "angst"
/archives//html/Topband/2012-05/msg00019.html (9,289 bytes)

291. Re: Topband: Fwd: radals fer 160m vertcal (score: 1)
Author: W2PM <w2pm@aol.com>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 11:14:59 -0400
Buds text here is what I mean - these are all the facts anyone needs and this information has been out there for a long while. Sent from my iPhone _______________________________________________ UR R
/archives//html/Topband/2012-05/msg00020.html (14,853 bytes)

292. Re: Topband: Receiving loops (score: 1)
Author: W2PM <w2pm@aol.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 11:45:53 -0400
Receiving antennas are about directivity, not sensitivity. That is the best way to reduce "noise" although a very small antenna can change the signal to noise ratio without being directional. Sent fr
/archives//html/Topband/2012-06/msg00137.html (12,559 bytes)

293. Re: Topband: Receiving loops (score: 1)
Author: W2PM <w2pm@aol.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 11:52:38 -0400
If you are referring to a magnetic loop the problem is not the pickup from the shield - that is the conductor for picking up the signals - all signals including noise. The issue with a magnetic loop
/archives//html/Topband/2012-06/msg00138.html (10,990 bytes)

294. Re: Topband: TX ANT TO RX ANT COUPLING (score: 1)
Author: W2PM <w2pm@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 06:50:43 -0400
Do you have much noise in the first place to reradiate? Line noise also is very spotty along a power line - along the same line of wires any nasty arcing noise can be very strong or very weak at cert
/archives//html/Topband/2012-06/msg00159.html (8,832 bytes)

295. Re: Topband: Receiving loops (score: 1)
Author: W2PM <w2pm@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 06:53:53 -0400
Agreed. Wasn't sure of which. On my flags and pennants I have no shield pick up which I account to both using well designed 16:1 transformers with isolated windings and having the coax run under grou
/archives//html/Topband/2012-06/msg00160.html (13,328 bytes)

296. Re: Topband: Laird ferrites (score: 1)
Author: W2PM <w2pm@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 13:14:02 -0400
I agree there are few people who have contributed more to ham radio as ON4UN and challenge anyone to show me an engineering text or any academic text with no errors or omissions. And I personally fou
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00034.html (10,764 bytes)

297. Re: Topband: Noise in the Shack - A new noise! (score: 1)
Author: W2PM <w2pm@aol.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 07:38:57 -0400
I'm done with external drives and now use cloud based backup services. Never worry now about the timelinness and availability of the backups. Sent from my iPad _______________________________________
/archives//html/Topband/2012-07/msg00075.html (7,836 bytes)

298. Re: Topband: Radials over a stone wall (score: 1)
Author: W2PM <w2pm@aol.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 09:22:44 -0400
Be real careful when drilling at those seam points tho as the bit can get stuck when hitting the harder area around the joint and if your holding on with both hands it will twist your arms around rea
/archives//html/Topband/2012-08/msg00179.html (16,993 bytes)

299. Re: Topband: Response to W8JI's comments about using a K2AV foldedcounterpoise at VK6VZ (score: 1)
Author: W2PM <w2pm@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 19:34:05 -0400
I would add however (having experience here) that an incremental improvement to a poor antenna can show significant results when you have a low baseline. Sent from my iPad ___________________________
/archives//html/Topband/2012-09/msg00241.html (10,896 bytes)

300. Re: Topband: Outing The Scofflaws... (score: 1)
Author: W2PM <w2pm@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 10:26:27 -0500
With all the explanations and angst over this type of behavior truly it comes down simply to pure unabashed idiocy by our "comrades". I'd just like to sit next to one of these guys while they r doing
/archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00171.html (11,642 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu