Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w0mu@w0mu.com: 276 ]

Total 276 documents matching your query.

61. Re: Topband: Brave New World (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 12:14:09 -0700
_________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00683.html (9,959 bytes)

62. Re: Topband: Rules vs. Ethics (was Brave New World) (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 15:02:43 -0700
I am still waiting for a real case scenario where remote radio has harmed or damaged someone, somehow........ You are confusing ethical and moral. There is nothing unethical either. It is condoned by
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00692.html (11,087 bytes)

63. Re: Topband: ham radio- NOT (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 18:28:33 -0700
When you guys really get tired of the internet radio can I have your stuff? I have a big garage. I will make good use of it since you won't be turning on your rigs anymore. Mike W0MU On 2/26/2015 6:1
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00704.html (8,393 bytes)

64. Topband: Remote now DXCC?? (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 09:01:16 -0700
Why are we centered on remote operations dirtying up the DXCC program? DXCC is far from clean now and from the limited amount of reading available people have been scamming DXCC long before I was lic
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00722.html (15,895 bytes)

65. Re: Topband: Question... (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 09:24:26 -0700
This is just another genie in a long list of genies that have been let out of the bottle. We will all live through it. Mike W0MU Wow...! What an interesting question I've posed re. my fictional "...w
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00724.html (9,535 bytes)

66. Re: Topband: Remote now DXCC?? (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 11:42:24 -0700
Why does publishing the results change anything. Is there a prize for being Honor Roll number 1? How do you account for all the other dirty contacts on the DXCC rolls? Those are just ignored and only
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00730.html (12,897 bytes)

67. Re: Topband: Remote now DXCC?? (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 14:21:25 -0700
What bad thing happened? A bunch of guys made contacts. Nothing bad happened. A sick station owner gets to build a station and have people operate it. In this case nothing bad happened. Why turn this
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00743.html (11,196 bytes)

68. Re: Topband: Remote now DXCC?? (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2015 22:19:54 -0700
This being made is that anyone could improperly, illegally, whatever use their own call...Ie a USA call from an Italy remote to work some rare DX. It certainly can and it probably happens. Cheaters w
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00000.html (10,207 bytes)

69. Re: Topband: DXCC Program Integrity (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2015 10:52:35 -0700
I think the ARRL does many good things for Amateur Radio. They are also involved in things that are good for them and not so much for us. Their latest call for comments is directly related to the RM1
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00016.html (9,919 bytes)

70. Topband: Improving low angle reception DX Eng 8 ele Circle RCV Array (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2015 11:52:20 -0700
I just recently hooked up my 8 ele rcv array and I was not too sure if it was working correctly. I will need to do some maintenance and checking when the snow is gone to make sure each element is wor
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00020.html (8,375 bytes)

71. Re: Topband: Inverted L height vs. length. (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2015 12:32:03 -0700
I have used one inverted L and the horses wiped it out a few years ago. I had about 70 ft of vertical and the rest horizontal. I am not sure how much interaction the tree will have if you run the wir
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00022.html (12,335 bytes)

72. Re: Topband: [Bulk] Improving low angle reception DX Eng 8 ele Circle RCV Array (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2015 22:57:12 -0700
I was just re reading the DXE manual on the circle array and they discuss adding 15 ft radials of 10 to 15 feet or adding a couple of ground rods per antenna. The first thing I will do is see if I ca
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00034.html (7,941 bytes)

73. Topband: E30FB (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 14:47:47 -0600
I heard the 17m op today which I suspect was N6PSE say he was going to be so he could be ready for 160 tonight. He also said that conditions on Topband have been very bad there and he was hoping for
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00059.html (6,608 bytes)

74. Re: Topband: What IS troubling about this report.... (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 22:48:02 -0600
Much of the time it is a simple mistake. I did it to the E30 tonight and I am trying to be very careful. I changed bands and came back and the split was cancelled. I was that Lid. Usually a simple up
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00062.html (20,485 bytes)

75. Re: Topband: Use of Remote Receivers During 160 Meter Contests (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 20:53:13 -0600
I agree with John, Receiving systems should be allowed only on the station property. I can understand the Stew Perry exemption but that opens up a can of worms. If you give an inch people will take a
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00088.html (17,029 bytes)

76. Re: Topband: Use of Remote Receivers During 160 Meter Contests (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 01:27:40 -0600
I strongly disagree with W2GD on one thing though. DX Contesting is an East Coast Old Boys' Club, and while it makes them happy and boosts their egos, it is NOT good for contesting in general. There
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00095.html (10,822 bytes)

77. Re: Topband: Use of Remote Receivers During 160 Meter Contests (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 09:31:32 -0600
We actually have three camps the two you describe below and the camp that will use all those things and then claim a class they are not really in. We all know that lots and lots of people use packet
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00112.html (11,290 bytes)

78. Re: Topband: Use of Remote Receivers During 160 Meter Contests (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 09:07:54 -0600
We are are going to allow remote receivers, why not remote transmitters all over the world too...It if were legal. We might as well just get on any one of the messaging systems, Facebook, Apple, Hang
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00137.html (11,032 bytes)

79. Re: Topband: Use of Remote Receivers During 160 Meter Contests (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 10:57:41 -0600
ARRL changed the rules to allow remotes within the country. I didn't. I don't even use remotes. The ARRL also allowed you to move around. These are completely different animals. Since you can move ar
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00142.html (12,245 bytes)

80. Re: Topband: Use of Remote Receivers During 160 Meter Contests (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 15:02:59 -0600
What is competitive about DXCC? How can we have a competition when there is no start and finish? Are people passionate about DXCC and working new ones? Absolutely! I am a member of the Mile Hi DX Ass
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00154.html (10,066 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu