Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w0mu@w0mu.com: 276 ]

Total 276 documents matching your query.

221. Re: Topband: New Modes, Systems, etc (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2020 15:24:02 -0700
People have been cheating forever and it will never end.  Cheaters need to be dealt with and ignored.  They cheat to get an award they have to pay for.  Cracks me up.  They cheat to win a contest whe
/archives//html/Topband/2020-01/msg00177.html (10,035 bytes)

222. Re: Topband: Remote receiver deafness. Was: New Modes, Systems, etc (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2020 18:45:52 -0700
When I had my skimmer going, I would use my R8 on 80 and 160.  I was shocked at some of the DX it spotted on 160 and 80. To back up with Vince is saying, it is often on a 'left over antenna', or mh H
/archives//html/Topband/2020-01/msg00184.html (9,761 bytes)

223. Topband: NA QSO Party CW is on tonight (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2020 18:47:49 -0700
Right now.  There should be lots of people around! Work em while you can. _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2020-01/msg00185.html (6,365 bytes)

224. Topband: Topband resource (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 09:40:55 -0700
https://topbandhams.com A link to some 160 antennas on that same site. https://topbandhams.com/tech-page/6-22-different-wire-antennas-for-the-160-meter-band?fbclid=IwAR06lTswgMULsdMs_wEtKWJXqWpuDgXZP
/archives//html/Topband/2020-01/msg00209.html (6,573 bytes)

225. Re: Topband: Topband resource (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 11:34:07 -0700
I did not read in detail any of the designs or what was on the site. On 1/14/2020 11:25 AM, fmoeves wrote: Mike, 160m antennas my favorite subject. I sure wish it would either get cold or dry out her
/archives//html/Topband/2020-01/msg00211.html (7,628 bytes)

226. Re: Topband: Topband resource (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 10:53:32 -0700
I was only really able to work Carib/CA/SA with my inverted v at 70 ft.  With the inverted L I get our far better.  I am a very long way from any salt water in any direction. W0MU Its interesting how
/archives//html/Topband/2020-01/msg00239.html (11,666 bytes)

227. Re: Topband: recording off the air (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 23:54:38 -0700
Dxlabs supports this. https://www.dxlabsuite.com/dxlabwiki/RecordAudio    N1MM logger+ has a recording mechanism but there is a bunch of apps that could do this.  As all the top contesters for many c
/archives//html/Topband/2020-01/msg00285.html (7,764 bytes)

228. Re: Topband: Any Linrad selective limiter noise blanker experts here? (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 08:40:08 -0700
The MFJ Noise canceler seems to work ok.  As a quick band aid for the contest.  I have an AN4 and have never been very impressed with it. W0MU Although my sample size is small the experts have told m
/archives//html/Topband/2020-01/msg00290.html (12,130 bytes)

229. Re: Topband: recording off the air (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 08:44:17 -0700
Agree 100 percent.  My philosophy is that when the contest is over the contest is over and the logs should be sent off. ASAP. The contest recordings could be used by contest sponsors to help adjudica
/archives//html/Topband/2020-01/msg00291.html (10,065 bytes)

230. Re: Topband: CQ WW 160 Observations (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 08:37:57 -0700
We had a decent opening on Saturday as reported by a few stations.  Otherwise I would agree that it was not great.  It was ok.  I did work MX5 on Friday night as my only EU and just a few on Saturday
/archives//html/Topband/2020-01/msg00361.html (6,747 bytes)

231. Re: Topband: CQ WW Contest (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 15:06:36 -0700
Fantastic! He would loud here. How does the circle array compare with the beverages? W0MU How were conditions at W3LPL in Maryland last weekend? Mark KD4D operated here last weekend using his call. C
/archives//html/Topband/2020-01/msg00366.html (12,181 bytes)

232. Re: Topband: CQ WW Contest (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 17:38:33 -0700
I suspected that your 8 circle array would be very directive with that spacing.  My 8 is really too small for 160 but I have no other options.  Any antenna is better than no antenna.  I did notice th
/archives//html/Topband/2020-01/msg00368.html (15,965 bytes)

233. Re: Topband: TI9A (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 10:58:37 -0700
They should have stayed on past EU Sunrise which would be the prime time to work them from NA.  Take a nap earlier in the day and stay up and wait? W0MU On 2/5/2020 10:56 AM, Thomas Hoyer via Topband
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00009.html (7,196 bytes)

234. Re: Topband: Remote operation (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2020 00:51:54 -0700
His email must have been routed remotely as it was written in the fall.  Strange. Let's see. It has been at least five years since RHR's "remote operation for the masses" hit the air waves. After sev
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00034.html (8,710 bytes)

235. Re: Topband: CQ WW 160 CW - SK.. ? (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 17:52:35 -0700
Just use your delete key and move on.  Don't let the actions of others ruin a great resource. W0MU I would expect subjects like: propagation, antennas, operating practice, etc. Not endless mails why
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00077.html (9,352 bytes)

236. Re: Topband: CQ WW 160 CW - SK.. (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 18:42:14 -0700
Hey don't leave out AM or spark gap! What would constitute an exceptional achievement on FT8? Thats like telling CW guys that their achievements arent really noteworthy compared to how the Sideband g
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00088.html (9,082 bytes)

237. Topband: 160digital@groups.io (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 19:18:45 -0700
Seems like a good time to plug this list again. 160digital@groups.io was created for the peaceful discussions of FT/X and other digital modes and anything else 160. Please join the group. 73 W0MU ___
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00092.html (6,339 bytes)

238. Re: Topband: 160digital@groups.io (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 11:27:22 -0700
Here is the direct link to the group.  https://groups.io/g/160Digital Gentlemen.......... W0MU 160digital@groups.io was created for the peaceful discussions of FT/X and other digital modes and anythi
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00099.html (7,419 bytes)

239. Topband: RG-179 Coax (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 16:31:41 -0700
I am looking for a good source for RG-179 coax to build some RX antennas.  I tried an Ebay seller and got rg58!!## W0MU _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Top
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00100.html (6,183 bytes)

240. Re: Topband: RG-179 Coax (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 00:40:07 -0700
I am making some receive antennas and the coax will be for the choke that goes through a torriod.  The cores I have would not take rg6. This is from the YCCC receive antenna array. W0MU Whats wrong w
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00108.html (8,845 bytes)

Current List: 221 - 240
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14]
This search system is powered by Namazu