Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w0mu@w0mu.com: 276 ]

Total 276 documents matching your query.

141. Re: Topband: RBOG through radial field (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 15:03:58 -0700
I would think that would cause issues with all those conductors. Can a RBOG run through a radial field without compromising performance? Tnx, Mike KA2FIR _________________ Topband Reflector Archives
/archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00041.html (7,398 bytes)

142. Re: Topband: Kostas' point (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 22:24:51 -0700
They are so cheap that people would buy their own and have friends around the world set them up.  It is probably being done now.  There is no way to stop the cheating.   They are individual awards. 
/archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00233.html (9,129 bytes)

143. Re: Topband: E31 (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 20:10:29 -0700
I saw on the cluster that their beverage was stolen by locals. Cannot confirm or not. Just FYI Don wd8dsb Yes, I heard all the US stations calling them too . . . as well as Europeans and Russians. Th
/archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00252.html (9,389 bytes)

144. Topband: Adding chicken wire or mesh on top of radial field (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2018 11:55:10 -0700
I have some 6ft wide chicken wire I can roll out on top of my existing radial field for 160.  Does anyone have an idea what this might do? W0MU _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://w
/archives//html/Topband/2018-01/msg00270.html (7,258 bytes)

145. Re: Topband: Adding a parasitic reflector to a vertical (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 14:18:35 -0700
Could you not get more out those elements if you had phased them?  Obviously there would be more work required for the phasing system.   One element short of a 4 square. My initial assessment indicat
/archives//html/Topband/2018-02/msg00053.html (11,587 bytes)

146. Re: Topband: Adding a parasitic reflector to a vertical (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2018 17:18:01 -0700
I was going to try to phase 2 80m verticals but just could not find the room.  You get endfire and broadside. I assume you have to put down the same radial field for a Parasitic element as a driven o
/archives//html/Topband/2018-02/msg00067.html (13,740 bytes)

147. Re: Topband: Fwd: Re: Belize-VK/ZL possibilities (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 21:37:57 -0700
If you are on one of the Islands such as Ambergris or cawker you would have plenty of Salt going west, if you can get a beach location on the East.  Same for some area of Placentia.  In February I di
/archives//html/Topband/2018-02/msg00081.html (12,120 bytes)

148. Re: Topband: Moderation (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 19:19:27 -0700
I trust in Tree! Some of trouble makers might be on moderation by default LOL. W0MU Respectfully, Tree, maybe you should go into Bill Tippett mod mode. He wasn't so subtle. (And now that I think abou
/archives//html/Topband/2018-02/msg00098.html (7,735 bytes)

149. Re: Topband: Conditions on 160m for ARRL Contest (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 09:22:02 -0700
I worked CT, CT3, F, JA, Kh6, KL7, UA9 for non carib or SA contacts.  I missed much of the early Saturday night opening as I was gone. I was very happy to log the JA and UA9!  Otherwise is was pretty
/archives//html/Topband/2018-02/msg00121.html (8,459 bytes)

150. Re: Topband: Wednesday 160m DX Activity Night (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 08:34:30 -0700
Tuesday I worked an EA7 on FT8. Wednesday activity FT8 wise was down quite a bit. When UK9AA was spotted on CW, as always I listened but thought, with these poor condx, there was no chance. To my sur
/archives//html/Topband/2018-02/msg00153.html (10,180 bytes)

151. Re: Topband: Does flooding radial field help (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2018 11:26:25 -0700
It was conditions and it was SSB!  I could not hear PJ4G last night.  The only DX that was "loud" was ZF2. W0MU On 2/24/2018 10:07 AM, Jack Henry via Topband wrote: I was struggling to be heard in th
/archives//html/Topband/2018-02/msg00184.html (8,727 bytes)

152. Re: Topband: Condx last night (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2018 15:08:04 -0700
You had a decent signal for KH6.   Circle array here for RCV. band was pretty quiet here.  Worked all over the USA, very little DX. On 2/24/2018 12:07 PM, cqtestk4xs-- via Topband wrote: My apologies
/archives//html/Topband/2018-02/msg00189.html (11,007 bytes)

153. Re: Topband: Wednesday 160m DX Activity Night (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 23:52:32 -0700
Activity was way down on FT8 as well. However, I was on last night on CW and was Spotted, and received by NA RBN stations. But no actual Contacts !! Hopefully there will be some activity tonight. I s
/archives//html/Topband/2018-03/msg00000.html (6,647 bytes)

154. Re: Topband: KH1/KH7Z TopBand Ops Brief (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2018 10:24:47 -0600
They said the same thing about 6m DX and FT8 is the dominate choice now. <After operating 7 straight nights on 160, my ears were ready for a break. We <switched to FT8 for about 5 hours, using the re
/archives//html/Topband/2018-07/msg00090.html (9,047 bytes)

155. Re: Topband: KH1/KH7Z TopBand Ops Brief (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2018 10:29:20 -0600
Thanks for the QSO! The 160 contact was much easier than the 80m one and now I know why.  I was not around for the FT8 160 but I probably would have passed as I had you guys on CW.  Signals were pret
/archives//html/Topband/2018-07/msg00091.html (16,326 bytes)

156. Re: Topband: Summer, but 160 ain't dead (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2018 10:31:00 -0600
I was decoded at VP8EME last night and the DP0 in Antarctica.  No contacts but good decodes. on the east G4UFK, not in test. on the west N6RO Western RBN's VE7CC, VE6WZ, NC7J, east spot (not RBN) ON7
/archives//html/Topband/2018-07/msg00092.html (8,244 bytes)

157. Re: Topband: Question about KH1 to EU QSO possibilities with respect to auroral oval (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2018 07:35:14 -0600
IARU was going on and lots of people are on 6m for E skip season.  I have been leaving my rcv on 6m not 160 lately. W0MU On 7/14/2018 7:50 PM, Grant Saviers wrote: Agree. At my QTH 47.6 N (Seattle) t
/archives//html/Topband/2018-07/msg00107.html (10,256 bytes)

158. Topband: FT8 Tonight (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2018 22:15:34 -0600
Once again being decoded at DP0GVN  -15db.  No contact is it appear they are just listening. _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
/archives//html/Topband/2018-07/msg00122.html (6,172 bytes)

159. Re: Topband: FT8 Tonight (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 17:45:30 -0600
Thanks...I never thought to look there.  I am usually hanging out on the 50mhz  chat. On 7/19/2018 4:02 PM, CT1EKD wrote: MIKE You can find  DH5CW/ DP0GVN Matthias  at the ON4KST chat, he as a modest
/archives//html/Topband/2018-07/msg00137.html (7,829 bytes)

160. Re: Topband: Location of WF RX Antenna. Need Expert Advice (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 16:29:02 -0600
Interesting.  My rcv array is probably 500 ft from the Xmit antenna or any antenna so I am probably ok?  My 70ft tower is 70ish feet from the 160 inverted l.  I wonder if there is much to be gained b
/archives//html/Topband/2018-07/msg00148.html (10,021 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu