Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca: 253 ]

Total 253 documents matching your query.

201. Re: Topband: 4SQ Arrays in proximity (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 19:29:38 -0400
I don't have a 160m 4-square but do have 20, 40 & 80m wire 4-squares all in close proximity. The 40m one especially is mostly in the NW quadrant of the 80m one. I have posted my results several times
/archives//html/Topband/2020-01/msg00351.html (8,065 bytes)

202. Re: Topband: CQ WW Contest (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 14:27:33 -0400
Like my neighbour Dave/WHS here a few grid squares away to my SW, I found condx "good" but certainly not great up here in Central New Brunswick, Canada where I am nowhere at all near salt water, bein
/archives//html/Topband/2020-01/msg00363.html (9,892 bytes)

203. Re: Topband: Inquiring minds want to know.... (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2020 16:52:11 -0400
Hi Dave, Sorry, I don't know the answer(s) to your questions but did want to say, thanks for writing this. I find it very interesting reading. I know VY2ZM conducted some experiments around noon on 1
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00049.html (8,259 bytes)

204. Re: Topband: CQ WW 160 CW - SK.. (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 16:38:01 -0400
If UY0ZG believes several of his countrymates are cheating, then he should seek assistance in gathering evidence and present it to the good folks at CQ160 (ie: I believe it's currently Andy, N2NT & c
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00081.html (7,052 bytes)

205. Re: Topband: ARRL CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 18:28:41 -0400
Yes there is Roger, RATE ! DX and US/VE stns make the minimum amount of contacts on bands with poor rate to get the most mults possible there and then CQ (or S&P) the more productive bands. Why work
/archives//html/Topband/2020-02/msg00134.html (8,410 bytes)

206. Re: Topband: RBN and cluster spots (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2020 20:01:08 -0300
Steve, I wish I knew the answer to your question. When I go assisted in contests, (which is probably only 20-30% of the time) I connect to VE7CC which carries RBN spots. ( I prefer to tune for my DX,
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00090.html (8,707 bytes)

207. Re: Topband: DXCC Committe (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 08:37:42 -0300
OK, so let me get this straight. You sent the DXCC desk a Doctored card, got busted, then claimed you didn't send it (you just wanted them to admire your skills?), got kicked out of the DXCC program
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00262.html (6,939 bytes)

208. Re: Topband: DXCC Committe (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 09:13:14 -0300
I'm not sure what your beef is with me , Mark/PA5MW. All I did was summarize his emails and brought no extra facts, opinions or innuendo's into play. I jumped to no conclusions. I asked a question at
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00265.html (10,313 bytes)

209. Re: Topband: DXCC Committe (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 09:33:55 -0300
No worries Mark. Dank u vel. Perhaps I have interpreted his facts (as presented) incorrectly. I do not know. That's why I prefaced my initial message with: "... OK, so let me get this straight:..." (
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00267.html (12,039 bytes)

210. Re: Topband: DXCC Committe (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 17:12:39 -0300
Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu <mailto:btippett%40alum.mit.edu> > FYI: http://g3txf.com/dxtrip/Fake-C21XF/Fake-C21.html _________________ wow..just wow...no other words are needed. wow _________
/archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00281.html (7,912 bytes)

211. Re: Topband: RG-6 Delay cables (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2020 15:48:57 -0300
Interesting Lee. I guess I never thought anything about delay lines in our weather here. I have RG-6-like cables on all my 4-squares. I was unaware electrons cared whether it was +35*C or -35*C (or g
/archives//html/Topband/2020-04/msg00033.html (7,144 bytes)

212. Re: Topband: Shunt Fed Tower SWR Troubles (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 11:03:47 -0300
Dale, What are you using as your capacitor in your gamma match? Like some of the others, this is what I would initially suspect also. (btdthtts) Mike VE9AA Mike, Coreen & Corey Keswick Ridge, NB ____
/archives//html/Topband/2020-08/msg00082.html (7,602 bytes)

213. Topband: Every mid week. . . (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2020 19:31:26 -0300
We see an announcement about "activity night" on Wednesday. (which borders on begging and cajoling at times) Every Thursday into Friday we see complaints from the same individual talking about the la
/archives//html/Topband/2020-10/msg00074.html (7,673 bytes)

214. Re: Topband: John ON4UN silent key (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 17:55:10 -0400
Sad. Another one gone. I have a couple of his books and found them quite useful. Like most of you, have worked John countless times on the low bands, and more recently either casually on 20m from my
/archives//html/Topband/2020-11/msg00058.html (7,097 bytes)

215. Re: Topband: Low Dipoles (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 16:28:29 -0400
I've had low (30-40' up) 160m dipoles in essentially 3 QTH's.and always had inverted L's to do A/B realtime comparisons. . Here up on a good sized hill (660'ASL), rocky excuse for soil. (14+ yrs) . A
/archives//html/Topband/2020-12/msg00174.html (9,098 bytes)

216. Re: Topband: Stew Perry (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2020 21:16:31 -0400
Joe, I see you entered this contest at least a couple times. 2019 & 2018, perhaps other times. What do you *think* folks are exchanging? (ie: RST and GS, or just GS?) *hint.it's a contest. Enter it a
/archives//html/Topband/2020-12/msg00219.html (6,922 bytes)

217. Topband: They gathered on 160 at night (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2020 09:26:28 -0400
By Mike VE9AA They gathered on 160 at night To have that friendly fight The static it crashed Some records got smashed The grids logged were mostly right Antennas were hung just before In hopes for a
/archives//html/Topband/2020-12/msg00228.html (8,238 bytes)

218. Re: Topband: standoff for inv L (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2020 11:20:38 -0400
VE9AA: I don't have a tower supported Inverted L, but I have a slightly different way of supporting the center of a 20m 4-square array of inverted L's and wanted something non conductive so I use 1.5
/archives//html/Topband/2020-12/msg00229.html (7,960 bytes)

219. Topband: Inverted J antennas? (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 16:51:51 -0400
Has anyone modeled an inverted J on 160m ? (almost an inverted U, really) I currently have only one left (the other half of my 2-el array blew down and I've been lazy to replace it) and it "works" bu
/archives//html/Topband/2021-01/msg00112.html (8,208 bytes)

220. Re: Topband: Inverted J antennas? (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 17:46:47 -0400
Hi Dave and thank you. That was quick. I guess I shouldve been clearer with my question. What does the elevation pattern look like please? Mike, Coreen & Corey Keswick Ridge, NB From: Dave Cuthbert [
/archives//html/Topband/2021-01/msg00114.html (9,601 bytes)

Current List: 201 - 220
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13]
This search system is powered by Namazu