Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca: 253 ]

Total 253 documents matching your query.

161. Re: Topband: 80 meter 4-Square verticals (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 19:02:30 -0400
Terry, I think Bill KH7XS just went through this exercise. That said, my (Comtek) 80m 4-square is made 100% from wire and hung in the woods as inverted L's. Raised radials. Seems to work. Electrons d
/archives//html/Topband/2018-02/msg00076.html (8,263 bytes)

162. Topband: FW: 80 meter 4-Square verticals (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 20:05:32 -0400
Hi Darrel, No, it's a mish mash of oddly shapen all wire inverted L's in the woods. The ends do not point at each other at all. Viewed from above, the entire mish mash of wires and 2 raised radials/p
/archives//html/Topband/2018-02/msg00078.html (9,457 bytes)

163. Re: Topband: 80 meter 4-square (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2018 17:40:01 -0300
If I've learned anything in my 40yrs a ham, then I know you'll get replies from all sides. I'll just advise you to build it and see. A couple years ago I asked a similar type of question about a 4Sq
/archives//html/Topband/2018-04/msg00076.html (8,414 bytes)

164. Re: Topband: cutting coax stubs for 80 meter 4-square (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 20:26:40 -0300
Terry, I wasn't going to say anything, but now that I hear this I have to tell you all that my (wonderful!) AA-230Pro came this way to me from the factory a few yrs ago. I spent big Canadian bux on i
/archives//html/Topband/2018-06/msg00074.html (8,952 bytes)

165. Re: Topband: VE1ZZ has passed on - Very Very Sad news! (Long) (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 17:20:59 -0300
Jeff, Thanks for passing this on. I have forwarded your (sad) note in its entirety to the MCC fellas. Your tour of his shack and visit were nearly identical to my own, sometime in the mid to late 199
/archives//html/Topband/2018-10/msg00117.html (9,097 bytes)

166. Re: Topband: VE1ZZ Nite (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2018 14:00:56 -0300
I never get on for the PRE-Stews(just the main STEW), but if you were to rename it to something honouring VE1ZZ, I would make a point to show up. (Maybe even make it into its own "real" contest, as m
/archives//html/Topband/2018-10/msg00149.html (7,341 bytes)

167. Re: Topband: VE1ZZ Nite (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2018 14:15:15 -0300
p.s.- Tree, If you do make it into its own (real) contest, one thing to think about is probably NOT using "VE1ZZ" in the title. (just in the description on the website) A 2-letter call VE call like t
/archives//html/Topband/2018-10/msg00150.html (8,438 bytes)

168. Re: Topband: PreStew / LowBand Jack (VE1ZZ) scores (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 20:39:32 -0300
Excellent! Good on the Boring ARC for keeping this fine fellows spirit alive in the ether... Happy to have contributed a tiny amount to help preserve Jack's/ZZ's memory for all. Maybe when you get th
/archives//html/Topband/2018-10/msg00217.html (8,452 bytes)

169. Topband: 160m Antenna, worse than I thought ! (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 16:26:22 -0400
de Mike VE9AA O-M-G -,If you read my 3830 report from CQWW CW.. I thought my 160m antenna had just 'fallen down' and was still 130' or whatever feet of wire at ~12'AGL, but when I was out in the wood
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00265.html (8,585 bytes)

170. Topband: ARRL 160, was Re: Polarization on 160m (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 17:40:51 -0400
Don't feel bad Herb. I'm in the same boat. I am a VE9..have been since 1993 when they split, NB, NS and VY2 into various distinct prefixes. I live in New Brunswick. (a real Province). Prefix VE9 In 9
/archives//html/Topband/2018-11/msg00308.html (8,404 bytes)

171. Re: Topband: Waller Flag (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2018 17:53:39 -0400
Stan, I have very little experience with them, however given your high noise level and small(ish?) lot (not sure how large it is), would a few BOG's be a better option I wonder? Looking forward to se
/archives//html/Topband/2018-12/msg00155.html (7,431 bytes)

172. Re: Topband: Inverted L improvements - Part 3 (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 19:17:42 -0400
".have attached 30 insulated wire radials each 42' in length (as suggested in a K9YC presentation referencing a K3LC study in the NCJ) laying on the ground roughly evenly distributed. The paper said
/archives//html/Topband/2019-01/msg00041.html (7,966 bytes)

173. Re: Topband: Inverted L improvements - Part 3 (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 20:32:09 -0400
Hi Todd and thanks for answering so quickly. I am no expert. (I'm an Electronics Engineering Technologist and a ham for 40+ yrs,fwiw) I won't debate the exact numbers on that table by K3LC referenced
/archives//html/Topband/2019-01/msg00043.html (9,849 bytes)

174. Re: Topband: Inverted L improvements - Part 3 (now with data) (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 18:12:53 -0400
So, now we're (apparently) recommending he cut back his already minimal radial field..uhhh, really Wes? =-Mike VE9AA I started this message a day or so ago. Others have commented since with some simi
/archives//html/Topband/2019-01/msg00087.html (10,292 bytes)

175. Re: Topband: Inverted L improvements - Part 3 (now with data) (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 18:51:56 -0400
Hey Todd, What happens to your Inverted L's SWR curve if you short your other 160m antenna (the 43'-T) to ground, or otherwise detune it somehow?..could be you're onto something..not sure. Wide SWR's
/archives//html/Topband/2019-01/msg00111.html (9,172 bytes)

176. Re: Topband: CQ160 Conditions (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 19:30:08 -0400
de VE9AA: I was only on this weekend for abt 6 hours, so am not an authority of what happened on 160..by a long shot. I did hear EU both evenings well before SS here and was able to eek out a few wes
/archives//html/Topband/2019-01/msg00149.html (8,493 bytes)

177. Re: Topband: CQ 160 (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 21:12:43 -0400
GE Jim, We can't possibly all remember 'who is located where' in the lower 48. For Canadians, we are locked to our call areas, so if you were to work a VE9 (for example) on 160m, you can be relativel
/archives//html/Topband/2019-01/msg00171.html (9,227 bytes)

178. Re: Topband: FT-8 (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2019 07:03:59 -0400
Bill just about summarized my feelings. I get no satisfaction from modes where I can't even hear anything in the speaker. I love that technology is marching forward, BUT I want to be there with it. I
/archives//html/Topband/2019-02/msg00000.html (8,339 bytes)

179. Re: Topband: V84SAA 10 Feb SR Report 80m and 160m (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2019 21:14:09 -0400
Hey Jeff, Last 2 nights here @ my SS 2145z (and even a few minutes before ) you've been SOLID copy on 80m CW. If I'm being honest, peaks are at 519 have been seen, but -419 most times. With a couple
/archives//html/Topband/2019-02/msg00102.html (8,774 bytes)

180. Re: Topband: V84SAA SR report 15 Feb - ANd final schedules of operation (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 07:06:29 -0400
Jeff, You guys had a good signal on 80m y'day at NA Maritime/New England SS (your SR). LP to the SE from here. AFACT, the 80m op did not ask for NA (a shame) and continued to work EU all the way thro
/archives//html/Topband/2019-02/msg00137.html (9,260 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu