Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:va3mw@portcredit.net: 86 ]

Total 86 documents matching your query.

41. Re: Topband: FT-8 (score: 1)
Author: Michael Walker <va3mw@portcredit.net>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2019 07:36:02 -0500
So.... I get up at 3 in the morning and go down to the CW part of the band to see if I can hear any of you guys calling CQ. NADA ... from what I can tell, the band is dead. Not one signal. I go up to
/archives//html/Topband/2019-02/msg00003.html (7,460 bytes)

42. Re: Topband: Rx splinter (score: 1)
Author: Michael Walker <va3mw@portcredit.net>
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2019 20:20:36 -0500
Some cable tv splitters will work below 2mhz. Youll need to test it to be sure. Mike va3mw Sent from my iPad _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflec
/archives//html/Topband/2019-02/msg00037.html (11,183 bytes)

43. Re: Topband: Lack of NA Activity on CW (score: 1)
Author: Michael Walker <va3mw@portcredit.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 16:15:24 -0400
Hi Roger Did you look up in the FT8 band? That is where everyone is. Mike va3mw _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2019-04/msg00113.html (8,579 bytes)

44. Re: Topband: Lack of NA Activity on CW (score: 1)
Author: Michael Walker <va3mw@portcredit.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 17:00:02 -0400
You maybe correct Roger. I was just telling you where they all went. :) I often hear .. no one on CW on 160M, but if you then look at the FT8 passband, it looks like 20M. Now, with FT4 coming, we mig
/archives//html/Topband/2019-04/msg00117.html (8,670 bytes)

45. Re: Topband: Ticks (score: 1)
Author: Michael Walker <va3mw@portcredit.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 11:16:06 -0400
For Ticks Make sure you are well covered with normal cloths. It is something to be concerned about, but not stressed about. When you get done, have someone inspect your entire body to see if any Tick
/archives//html/Topband/2019-07/msg00016.html (12,353 bytes)

46. Re: Topband: FT-8 performance (score: 1)
Author: Michael Walker <va3mw@portcredit.net>
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 11:16:24 -0400
Good morning Do we know if the SNR is calculated over the RF passband filter width, or is is calculated over AF filter bandwidth in the WSJTx engine, which it knows? There is a big difference. Mike v
/archives//html/Topband/2019-08/msg00016.html (15,095 bytes)

47. Re: Topband: FT-8 performance (score: 1)
Author: Michael Walker <va3mw@portcredit.net>
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 14:46:35 -0400
You might want to listen to this TAPR presentation on Noise and Noise calculations. https://youtu.be/xXXj1Ko4ZXg I found it pretty interesting. Mike va3mw _________________ Searchable Archives: http:
/archives//html/Topband/2019-08/msg00039.html (8,915 bytes)

48. Re: Topband: 160: Digital only DXCC needed - AKA, things that will kill the hobby.................. (score: 1)
Author: Michael Walker <va3mw@portcredit.net>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 16:22:39 -0400
OMG... No one is mandating that you use FT8. If you don't like it, don't use it. End of Story. What is the big deal? This is sounding like your mother telling you to eat all your Grits before you lea
/archives//html/Topband/2019-08/msg00188.html (12,241 bytes)

49. Re: Topband: Effect of trees on vertical elements? (score: 1)
Author: Michael Walker <va3mw@portcredit.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 21:56:27 -0400
All I have been running a 160M Inverted L right up beside some pine trees to the 80ft level and then I have the horizontal part moving away. The support for the vertical part is in the tree it runs u
/archives//html/Topband/2019-08/msg00218.html (9,212 bytes)

50. Re: Topband: FYI Robot contacts "outlawed" by ARRL (score: 1)
Author: Michael Walker <va3mw@portcredit.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 10:22:43 -0400
Dave A better definition of Robot is required..(this is not related to remote -- a remote is a long mic cord) Yes, there are versions of WSJTx that have been compiled that are 100%. You go to bed and
/archives//html/Topband/2019-08/msg00222.html (9,055 bytes)

51. Re: Topband: FYI Robot contacts "outlawed" by ARRL (score: 1)
Author: Michael Walker <va3mw@portcredit.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 10:27:18 -0400
Found it Mike va3mw 35. Ms, Jairam moved, seconded by Mr. Williams: WHEREAS, there has been a growing concern over fully automated contacts being made and claimed for DXCC credit, THEREFORE, BE IT RE
/archives//html/Topband/2019-08/msg00223.html (10,070 bytes)

52. Re: Topband: Inverted L in contact with leaves (score: 1)
Author: Michael Walker <va3mw@portcredit.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 12:40:47 -0400
Hi Pete You won't have an issue at all. 73, Mike va3mw _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2019-08/msg00284.html (8,513 bytes)

53. Re: Topband: Drone (score: 1)
Author: Michael Walker <va3mw@portcredit.net>
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2019 18:53:25 -0400
I have used Quad Copters for years. In fact, there was a Picture of me doing in QST about 8 years ago! It is by far the most accurate way to make it happen! Mike va3mw _________________ Searchable Ar
/archives//html/Topband/2019-08/msg00303.html (7,793 bytes)

54. Re: Topband: inverted l (score: 1)
Author: Michael Walker <va3mw@portcredit.net>
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2019 21:52:53 -0400
Hi Doug Ignore those splitting hairs. :) Yes, and inverted L will represent a load that should work for your radio without any additional tuners (should). I run an inverted L right up the side of an
/archives//html/Topband/2019-09/msg00018.html (9,237 bytes)

55. Re: Topband: Hairpin match to inverted L? (score: 1)
Author: Michael Walker <va3mw@portcredit.net>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2019 08:13:43 -0400
When I did my Inverted L with the elevated radials, I think the impedance was about 38 ohms. I decided to wind a 1.5:1 Unun based on Cecil's book on a K Mix. That brought it nicely in line to about 5
/archives//html/Topband/2019-09/msg00020.html (11,671 bytes)

56. Re: Topband: Desiccant in Beverage Boxes (score: 1)
Author: Michael Walker <va3mw@portcredit.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 11:26:56 -0400
I have long given up trying to waterproof boxes from Rain. I keep them rain proof and make sure there are multiple places for water to run out. I also do a lot with Alpine Ski racing and we have timi
/archives//html/Topband/2019-10/msg00195.html (9,887 bytes)

57. Re: Topband: A Bit of Zone 2 History Was Made Last Week (score: 1)
Author: Michael Walker <va3mw@portcredit.net>
Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2019 10:38:43 -0500
Regardless of what the others say and who are thankless... For those that committed time, vacation and certainly lots of personal CASH, I thank the entire team. Your contributions to the hobby are ce
/archives//html/Topband/2019-11/msg00019.html (12,553 bytes)

58. Re: Topband: A Bit of Zone 2 History Was Made Last Week (score: 1)
Author: Michael Walker <va3mw@portcredit.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2019 20:15:22 -0500
It is clear that the 160M is just full of grumpy old farts. That is ok, we are getting used to it. :) You'd think someone is making them use FT8. No one said you had to use it. If you don't like it,
/archives//html/Topband/2019-11/msg00034.html (15,648 bytes)

59. Re: Topband: Less FT8, more DX with power failures (score: 1)
Author: Michael Walker <va3mw@portcredit.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 23:38:24 -0500
More than once now, I found my 160m noise related to a plugged in and not in use power tool battery charger. Mike va3mw _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Top
/archives//html/Topband/2019-11/msg00079.html (12,051 bytes)

60. Re: Topband: H40TT on 160m (score: 1)
Author: Michael Walker <va3mw@portcredit.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 21:30:07 -0500
Nice. Your comment was really not even worth making. Lets call it bullying _________________ Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2019-11/msg00154.html (11,230 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu