Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:tod@k0to.us: 122 ]

Total 122 documents matching your query.

41. Re: Topband: "synchronous noise blanker" (score: 1)
Author: "Tod-ID" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 21:25:17 -0600
The reflector [and I] have received several messages with links to various sites that write about synchronous noise blankers. My original question was directed at finding out if anyone on the reflect
/archives//html/Topband/2007-02/msg00105.html (9,151 bytes)

42. Re: Topband: "synchronous noise blanker" (score: 1)
Author: "Tod-ID" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 09:55:27 -0600
Tom sent me this directly and I thought I would put it on the reflector so there is a wider awareness of his experience with synchronous blanking circuits from some time ago. He notes also that elect
/archives//html/Topband/2007-02/msg00111.html (9,713 bytes)

43. Topband: FW: Synchronous noise blanker -an actual user (score: 1)
Author: "Tod-ID" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 00:11:42 -0600
I contacted Dick, WA3USG, who had actually built and used a synchronous noise blanker. He was kind enough to give me some observations based upon his use. Most importantly, he provided URLs to two wa
/archives//html/Topband/2007-02/msg00114.html (11,539 bytes)

44. Re: Topband: SDR vs. Hardware defined radio [HDR] (score: 1)
Author: "Tod-ID" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 10:03:15 -0700
Actually, both types are defined by hardware but let's not be picky. I , and I suspect many others, are the beneficiaries of this 'mild' disagreement between two guys with a lot of 'smarts' and exper
/archives//html/Topband/2007-02/msg00181.html (7,246 bytes)

45. Re: Topband: BY Dragon S-9 (score: 1)
Author: "Tod-ID" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 08:15:19 -0600
Is the noise similar to or related to the noise that was on 7120-7160 kHz this morning [5:45 AM MDT]? I looked at that one with a spectrum analyzer and a couple days ago recorded a small time segment
/archives//html/Topband/2007-03/msg00107.html (7,423 bytes)

46. Re: Topband: Topband contributors (score: 1)
Author: "Tod-ID" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 07:40:35 -0600
When we recognize people who make very significant contributions to Topband success and enjoyment I suggest we put Bill Tippet, W4ZV, our list manager/moderator very close to the top of that list. Wi
/archives//html/Topband/2007-05/msg00011.html (6,504 bytes)

47. Re: Topband: Share of a common mode current experience (score: 1)
Author: "Tod-ID" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 11:31:49 -0600
Jim: I have not been paying attention to this thread until now. What parameters are you looking for in the choke you are planning to make? I have a few of the 2.4" type #31 cores and some Teflon coax
/archives//html/Topband/2007-06/msg00026.html (8,388 bytes)

48. Topband: Reality check request (score: 1)
Author: "Tod-ID" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 14:09:29 -0600
I know that there are a number of fellows on this reflector who are skillful at computer modeling of antennas -- I wish I was one of them. I have, however, made a stab at modeling an inverted L anten
/archives//html/Topband/2007-08/msg00130.html (9,035 bytes)

49. Re: Topband: Commercially available traps for BC Trapper? (score: 1)
Author: "Tod -MN" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 15:58:12 -0500
I am using a Unadilla trap as an element of an 80-160m vertical antenna which is 52 feet high. At that point I connected a top loading wire for 160m. The wire length and orientation is adjusted to ac
/archives//html/Topband/2007-10/msg00003.html (8,787 bytes)

50. Topband: Using DXEngineering NCC-1 and a pair of ARAV2-1P Active RXverticals (score: 1)
Author: "Tod -ID" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 13:05:19 -0500
In the recent [yesterday] Stew Perry warm-up I used my newly installed NCC-1 and a pair of ARAV2-1P active RX verticals. At my location with the installation parameters I used I found that there is a
/archives//html/Topband/2007-10/msg00113.html (11,433 bytes)

51. Topband: NCC and phased Active verticals follow up (score: 1)
Author: "Tod -ID" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 23:56:43 -0500
Since the original posting I have made some additional measurements and wish to comment on the 1850 kHz spur I observed. This spur is apparently caused by the following: The DXE Active Vertical is de
/archives//html/Topband/2007-10/msg00144.html (9,673 bytes)

52. Re: Topband: Silver Plated Conductor (score: 1)
Author: "Tod -ID" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 08:49:43 -0700
As I recall 1 micron is 40 microinches [OK 39.39 microinches]. That would mean a 2 micron layer is 80 microinches or 0.00008 inches - about 50 times less than the "Highly polish-able" grade silver p
/archives//html/Topband/2007-11/msg00170.html (9,360 bytes)

53. Re: Topband: reflections on contest (score: 1)
Author: "Tod -ID" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 08:45:30 -0700
That's life on Topband, not 5 kW in the attic. Tod, K0TO _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topb
/archives//html/Topband/2007-12/msg00021.html (7,161 bytes)

54. Topband: Idaho Falls report (score: 1)
Author: "Tod -ID" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 08:54:14 -0700
Well today is a special day. This morning at 0030 local time [0730 UTC] I heard G3FPQ, David, calling CQ and occasionally working East Coast stations. The signal varied between 569 and 579. David has
/archives//html/Topband/2007-12/msg00056.html (7,976 bytes)

55. Re: Topband: Idaho Falls report - corrected (score: 1)
Author: "Tod -ID" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 23:05:48 -0700
A terrible error -- I mis-typed my friend Bob Leo's call. I typed W7LT but is should have typed W7LR. {I don't know why they decided that "T" and "R" should be that close on my keyboard. My apologies
/archives//html/Topband/2007-12/msg00066.html (6,791 bytes)

56. Re: Topband: bandpass filters (score: 1)
Author: "Tod -ID" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 16:04:03 -0700
Based on those curves I would suggest folks get W3NQN's articles about RX filters and build one of them. The results should be a lot better in squashing the BCB signals at 1700 kHz and lower. They at
/archives//html/Topband/2007-12/msg00071.html (7,814 bytes)

57. Re: Topband: Vertical array (score: 1)
Author: "Tod -MN" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 17:35:02 -0600
Joe: Have you actually tried this or is it a thought that ought to work? If you have tried it I am curious to know how you handled the injection of signals [from the choice of three]. I own the NCC-
/archives//html/Topband/2007-12/msg00114.html (10,343 bytes)

58. Re: Topband: Antenna Noise canceller (score: 1)
Author: "Tod -MN" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 16:12:23 -0600
Josep: It may be informative to look at one of my web pages that has several links to experiments I performed using an MFJ-1026. I believe the ANC-4 is similar though not identical to the 1026. You w
/archives//html/Topband/2007-12/msg00136.html (7,499 bytes)

59. Re: Topband: noise canceller comparison (score: 1)
Author: "Tod -MN" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 19:20:49 -0600
I occurred to me that I should have posted this to the reflector rather than only to Jon Yes. The NCC-1 costs about 2 times the price of the MFJ-1026. Both units will cancel noise quite well. The NCC
/archives//html/Topband/2007-12/msg00159.html (8,700 bytes)

60. Re: Topband: Why not add power class to SP TBDC exchange? (score: 1)
Author: "Tod -MN" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 14:38:00 -0600
As I understand things one does NOT get QRP credit unless the QRP station submits a log. If, as a hypothetical, one were to make an error in copying the power and entered a "Q" in the log rather tha
/archives//html/Topband/2008-01/msg00012.html (8,896 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu