Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:tod@k0to.us: 122 ]

Total 122 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: 4. MFJ noise canceller (Donald Chester) (score: 1)
Author: tod@k0to.us (Tod Olson - Idaho)
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 00:24:29 -0700
I purchased the MFJ Noise canceller about 5 years ago at Dayton. I have been using recently to combat 80 meter noise. It is highly dependent upon the sense antenna. For best noise canceling the sense
/archives//html/Topband/2002-12/msg00077.html (8,740 bytes)

2. Topband: QRSS on 160m (score: 1)
Author: tod@k0to.us (Tod Olson - Idaho)
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 23:52:57 -0700
I thought perhaps another member of the ARRL 160 meter band plan review committee might comment, but seeing none has I would point out that the recommendation to the ARRL Board was that experimental
/archives//html/Topband/2002-11/msg00076.html (7,924 bytes)

3. RE: Topband: PSK-31 (score: 1)
Author: "Tod Olson" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 22:28:51 -0600
Brett Any suggestions on which card(s) might be 'cleaner' than others? Tod _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mai
/archives//html/Topband/2004-04/msg00254.html (7,737 bytes)

4. RE: Topband: BEVERAGES (score: 1)
Author: "Tod - Idaho" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 11:32:04 -0600
Craig said, "> I should have given this before. Here's the citation: If someone who has this article would choose to scan it and move it into .pdf format one of us on this reflector would probably be
/archives//html/Topband/2004-08/msg00061.html (7,591 bytes)

5. Topband: Quick info (score: 1)
Author: "Tod - Idaho" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 15:58:17 -0600
Before I start a search of the archives and the web I thought I would ask a question that I think has been commented on here: Is it possible to model antennas such as a Beverage or the bidirectional
/archives//html/Topband/2004-08/msg00083.html (11,116 bytes)

6. RE: Topband: ARRL Bandwidth petition (score: 1)
Author: "Tod - ID" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 14:02:21 -0500
See Tom's comment below: My comment is that I do NOT want to change the 40 meter allocations so that Europeans can move up to 7.150 etc. Working simplex on 40 meters is a sure way to eliminate compet
/archives//html/Topband/2004-08/msg00095.html (9,105 bytes)

7. RE: Topband: 2004 ARRL 160M Contest (score: 1)
Author: "Tod - ID" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 11:48:48 -0700
My friend Mr. Peterson makes an interesting point which has a fairly obvious, though unacceptable, solution. Simply make the ARRL 160 meter contest a one band SS contest with the stipulation that DX
/archives//html/Topband/2004-11/msg00293.html (8,949 bytes)

8. Topband: Keyclick CATHARSIS (score: 1)
Author: "Tod - MN" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 12:23:16 -0600
Actually, I am pleased that we have devoted so many pages of emails to FT1000 series key clicks. It is a thing that happens every year about this time. Once everyone has received the cathartic relief
/archives//html/Topband/2005-01/msg00239.html (9,446 bytes)

9. Topband: EWE/Flag/K9AY modeling (score: 1)
Author: "Tod - ID" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:39:44 -0600
Anyone on the list have an EZNEC model of any of these they feel is put together correctly. I am uncomfortable with the ones I have done and their results. If you are willing to send a model for me t
/archives//html/Topband/2005-07/msg00019.html (6,438 bytes)

10. Topband: K9AY, EWE and Pennant EZNEC Models (score: 1)
Author: "Tod - ID" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 20:50:37 -0600
I wish to specifically thank Gary, K9AY; Bob, N5WG; Terry, N6RY; Ed, Ve3XZ; Tom, W1TO; Paul, W8AEF; George, K8GG; Pete, N4ZR; Roy, W5TCX and Earl, K6SE for so very quickly and generously providing me
/archives//html/Topband/2005-07/msg00021.html (7,113 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: Efficiently Matching Low-Impedance Antennas to 50ohms (score: 1)
Author: "Tod - MN" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 21:07:00 -0500
Ron: I will give you my thoughts. Since the price for them is zero they may have exactly that value. If we assume your readings are correct (and they sound quite reasonable to me based upon my measur
/archives//html/Topband/2005-09/msg00075.html (9,695 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: Efficiently Matching Low-Impedance Antennas to 50 ohms (score: 1)
Author: "Tod - ID" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 12:07:39 -0500
Roger, you are absolutely correct and that is how I handle things here in Idaho where I use CATV lines for runs over 100 feet. I set things up so that there is a low loss matching network at the bas
/archives//html/Topband/2005-10/msg00030.html (8,644 bytes)

13. Re: Topband: W8JI FT1000MP MKV Click Modification (score: 1)
Author: "Tod - MN" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 10:46:03 -0600
Mike: I am on the road at the moment Mike, but I would like to check out my modified radio when I get back to Idaho next week. I hope some other folks take the time to look at their radio as well. L
/archives//html/Topband/2005-10/msg00211.html (8,276 bytes)

14. Topband: Experiments with band pass filter and K9AY loop (score: 1)
Author: "Tod" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 19:05:33 -0700
I ran some experiments this afternoon and put them up on my web site. It was an exercise that gave me a chance to look at the loop and also to figure out how to quickly get stuff on a website. The ex
/archives//html/Topband/2005-11/msg00331.html (6,787 bytes)

15. Topband: band pass filter and K9AY loop signals (score: 1)
Author: "Tod" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 09:46:21 -0700
Since posting this on my web site there have been a number of questions and suggestions. I have incorporated some of them in the site and now have revision 3 in place. I have included photos of the f
/archives//html/Topband/2005-11/msg00355.html (6,779 bytes)

16. Topband: Measurements (score: 1)
Author: "Tod" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 15:17:42 -0700
After the contest ( this morning) I decided to measure the K9AY loop control box filter/preamp characteristics. The two loops worked so well in the contest that there were times when I thought I was
/archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00024.html (7,483 bytes)

17. Re: Topband: ARRL (score: 1)
Author: "Tod" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 19:29:31 -0700
Bob. I am sure you did not mean to suggest that the ARRL had an SSB mode contest on 160 meters -- the closest thing to that is the ARRL DX SSB Contest which has 160 meter SSB activity. Although a few
/archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00052.html (10,432 bytes)

18. Re: Topband: Horizontal antennas (score: 1)
Author: "Tod" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 16:21:32 -0600
Hi Bob: I read this message and the previous one with interest. Using your information I have come up with why I don't seem to get the RX bang that I should (I want?) from my receiving antennas. Clea
/archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00116.html (7,566 bytes)

19. Topband: MFJ-1026 Noise Cancellation (score: 1)
Author: "Tod" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 22:33:09 -0600
Because of a sudden appearance of a line noise I had to get out my MFJ-1026 and set it up to cancel the RF intrusion while I wait for the power company to replace the defective street light in a subd
/archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00294.html (7,259 bytes)

20. Re: Topband: MFJ-1026 Noise Cancellation - sound examples (score: 1)
Author: "Tod" <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 19:04:53 -0600
I have added three audio clips which show the MFJ-1026 cancelling noise on 75 and 80 meters. They were recorded at about 5 PM Mountain Time and the signals are from the East Coast. I suppose that is
/archives//html/Topband/2006-01/msg00306.html (7,609 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu