Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:timcoad@excite.com: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] N9JIM/6 & NU6S team up in CM97 (score: 1)
Author: timcoad@excite.com (Tim Coad)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:09 2003
Hi guys, At the last minute Jim and I decided to put on that rare grid .... CM97 ;-) on the air this weekeend. We will be on a mountain in the S.F south bay area. We will have 6 thru 1296, 10Ghz, and
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg00766.html (6,832 bytes)

2. [VHFcontesting] FS: Ten Tec 1208(a) 6mtr Xverter & Lunar 6 mtr amp. (score: 1)
Author: timcoad@excite.com (Tim Coad)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:02 2003
An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://dayton.akorn.net/pipermail/vhfcontesting/attachments/20020310/a70de14c/attachment.htm
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg00900.html (6,736 bytes)

3. [VHFcontesting] June VHF and UHF contests QST results available (score: 1)
Author: timcoad@excite.com (Tim Coad)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:29 2003
Very poor coverage indeed. No regional boxes. Total top 10 boxes are near meaningless for VHF contests. I think the ARRL should get out the contest arena and let organizations that care about contest
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01106.html (9,360 bytes)

4. [VHFcontesting] June VHF and UHF contests QST results available (score: 1)
Author: timcoad@excite.com (Tim Coad)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:30 2003
The prose is fine. I am not complaining about what is there. I am complaining about what is missing. And yes I know the author has little control over this, which is why I aimed my complaints at the
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01115.html (10,889 bytes)

5. [VHFcontesting] Full Web results now published (score: 1)
Author: timcoad@excite.com (Tim Coad)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:30 2003
Wow, I agree. The web write-up is excellent. Tim - NU6S _______________________________________________ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web!
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01133.html (6,680 bytes)

6. [VHFcontesting] Looking for new xcvr (score: 1)
Author: timcoad@excite.com (Tim Coad)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:21 2003
I took my IC756pro to the top of the hill in June and was very impressed with its ability to handle close loud signals. I imagine the 746pro would probably be about the same. Tim - NU6S -- On Sat 09/
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01364.html (10,091 bytes)

7. [VHFcontesting] PWR Inverter question (score: 1)
Author: timcoad@excite.com (Tim Coad)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:39 2003
Thinking about getting a pwr inverter for turning a small rotor and running the laptop for portable VHF contests. Wondering if any one has input on if they can cause a lot of RF noise. Better brands?
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01543.html (6,822 bytes)

8. [VHFcontesting] VHF Contest Cert. - Suitable for filing (score: 1)
Author: timcoad@excite.com (Tim Coad)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:44 2003
Just got a certificate in the mail for the June 2002 VHF contest. It's been a few years since I have received one. Unlike the others I have framed on my wall, this one is suitable for filing, not fra
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01739.html (7,194 bytes)

9. [VHFcontesting] What version of CT for June contest? (score: 1)
Author: timcoad@excite.com (Tim Coad)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:53 2003
Thanks, by the way I see on the K1EA site that there is a new version of CT with bug fixes for the VHF and Field Day contests. I am going to download and test it tonight. Thanks to all. Tim - NU6S Yo
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01999.html (8,636 bytes)

10. [VHFcontesting] W3ZZ & Activity Level in June ARRL VHF QSO Party (score: 1)
Author: timcoad@excite.com (Tim Coad)
Date: Sun Jun 29 12:39:31 2003
I saw almost zero FM activity (except on 223.5) this year in CM87. It gets less each year. In the 80's and early 90's I could easily make 200 FM contacts from home (300 to 400 from a hill top) on 2 m
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg02161.html (9,399 bytes)

11. [VHFcontesting] Add 1.2GHz SSB or FM - Opinion? (score: 1)
Author: timcoad@excite.com (Tim Coad)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:46 2003
Hi guys, sorry no comments about rule changes... I am hoping to add another band for the next contest. Looks like for the same money I can either buy a DEM 1296-144 transverter or a FM 1.2GHz FM Mobi
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg02228.html (7,817 bytes)

12. [VHFcontesting] IC-910 H question (score: 1)
Author: timcoad@excite.com (Tim Coad)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:49 2003
Hi all, Just wondering if anyone here has used this ICOM 2/432/(optional 1296) radio? Wondering how the receiver compares with ICOM 251 or 271/471 type. I have heard it is not suited for east coast m
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg02308.html (7,094 bytes)

13. [VHFcontesting] What version of CT for June contest? (score: 1)
Author: timcoad@excite.com (Tim Coad)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:52 2003
I used 9.81 last year , it worked fine but is not Cabrillo compliant for the VHF tests. Just downloaded 9.89 and it will not change freq/modes properly for me. Anybody know what (or if) there is a ve
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg02424.html (7,120 bytes)

14. [VHFcontesting] FS: Ten Tec 1208(a) 6mtr Xverter & Lunar 6 mtr amp. (score: 1)
Author: timcoad@excite.com (Tim Coad)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:02 2003
An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://dayton.akorn.net/pipermail/vhfcontesting/attachments/20020310/a70de14c/attachment.htm
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2002-03/msg00033.html (6,736 bytes)

15. RE: [VHFcontesting] 2004 ARRL June VHF - Final Claimed Scores (score: 1)
Author: "Tim Coad" <timcoad@excite.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 11:46:47 -0400 (EDT)
Here's another score from SCV:Call: NU6S Category: Single Operator Power: Low Power Band: All Band Mode: Mixed Mode State: CA BAND QSO QSO PTS GRIDS 50 144 144 47 144 109 109 15 222 19 38 7 432 75 15
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-07/msg00038.html (7,667 bytes)

16. [VHFcontesting] NU6S Jan VHF contest (score: 1)
Author: "Tim Coad" <timcoad@excite.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 02:09:12 -0500 (EST)
ARRL Jan 2006 VHF Contest Worked about 5 hrs on Saturday and 3 hrs on Sunday. Low Power SCV CM87 (Home QTH in Cupertino flat lands) Band QSOs Grd 50 44 10 IC-756PRO 144 55 12 IC-251/HK 75W amp (tks N
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-01/msg00086.html (7,576 bytes)

17. Re: [VHFcontesting] How Good was 6 Meters in the 2006 June Contest? (score: 1)
Author: "Tim Coad" <timcoad@excite.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 15:53:58 -0400 (EDT)
Actually once the contest started , six meters was pretty spotty at best on Saturday from CM87 and rather disappointing compared with the morning opening and other years. Tim - NU6S As many have alre
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-06/msg00109.html (10,586 bytes)

18. [VHFcontesting] 50.125 ..yes, but what about 144.200? (score: 1)
Author: "Tim Coad" <timcoad@excite.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 22:51:58 -0400 (EDT)
There might be a problem with 50.125... but the one that bugs me is the problem where people are glued to 144.200 during the contest. Here in the SF bay area you can call CQ for 1/2 hour on 144.190 o
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-06/msg00013.html (8,481 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu