Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:telegrapher9@gmail.com: 189 ]

Total 189 documents matching your query.

61. Re: Topband: Erroneous info on ARRL web site about ARRL 160 contest (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 07:01:02 -0700
The rules are simple and clear: 1.1. Stations located in overseas and non-contiguous U.S. Territories may be worked by DX stations. This includes Alaska KL7, the Caribbean US possessions KP1-KP5, and
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00259.html (8,439 bytes)

62. Re: Topband: Adding a Ground to Elevated Feed Vertical? (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 14:34:37 -0700
_______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00278.html (8,499 bytes)

63. Re: Topband: experimenting with inverted L (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 13:48:45 -0700
The radiation resistance of your antenna is 12 ohms. The 1.5:1 VSWR tells us the base resistance is either 33 or 75 ohms. The ground loss resistance is either 21 or 63 ohms. The radiation efficiency
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00300.html (8,088 bytes)

64. Re: Topband: Tuning an Inverted-L (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 17:07:56 -0700
Dan, NEC-2 shows a 2:1 VSWR bandwidth of 70 kHz for your antenna and that's with a zero ohm ground. You should be seeing about 90 kHz. You might check it after dark when the AM BC stations reduce pow
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00412.html (8,199 bytes)

65. Re: Topband: T Vertical feed (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:25:52 -0700
The radiation resistance is 25 ohms. I estimate your base referred ground loss resistance to be 10 ohms. So, you should expect a VSWR of 1.4:1 fed directly with 50 ohm coax. To obtain a better match
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00312.html (9,180 bytes)

66. Re: Topband: T Vertical feed (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:08:04 -0700
The simulated radiation resistance is 16 ohms, your GND loss is 9 ohms and efficiency is 64%. No balun is needed. _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? B
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00332.html (9,686 bytes)

67. Re: Topband: T Vertical feed (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:55:16 -0700
No I mean no balun is needed. The coaxial cable external shield current will be roughly that of one radial. With so many radials the shield current will be low. ______________________________________
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00336.html (9,533 bytes)

68. Re: Topband: T Vertical feed (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:51:39 -0700
I had considered this case and it is valid with lossless GND or in free space. But over lossy ground one resonant "radial" with many short radials carries the about the same current. While not entire
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00343.html (10,274 bytes)

69. Re: Topband: T Vertical feed (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 10:32:05 -0700
Charles, Joe listed some symptoms of excessive feedine common-mode current such as RF bites and RF feedback. If you do not suffer from any of these effects a balun may be of no use. If one does exper
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00344.html (12,112 bytes)

70. Re: Topband: Help With Vertical Antenna Matching (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 10:06:10 -0700
Phil, NEC shows that shortening the radials to 110' will resonate things at 1.8 MHz. The ends are 10' from ground. The radial length can be used to adjust the antenna to resonance. The input impedanc
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00054.html (9,606 bytes)

71. Re: Topband: Help With Vertical Antenna Matching (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 11:01:27 -0700
100 +j0 or close to it. _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00056.html (11,246 bytes)

72. Re: Topband: Help With Vertical Antenna Matching (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 18:39:01 -0700
Exactly. Dave WX7G _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00057.html (11,316 bytes)

73. Re: Topband: Radials help (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:56:50 -0700
The paper by Rudy Severns, EXPERIMENTAL DETERMINATION OF GROUND SYSTEM PERFORMANCE FOR HF VERTICALS PART 7 GROUND SYSTEMS WITH MISSING SECTORS is illuminating. _______________________________________
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00124.html (12,392 bytes)

74. Re: Topband: NCJ Ground Radial Article (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 04:55:40 -0700
Radials do not affect the angle of radiation. Dave WX7G _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00145.html (8,018 bytes)

75. Re: Topband: 160m dethroned? 600m the new top band? (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 08:27:33 -0700
I believe the proposed rule is 2 watts ERP. The typical 70 x 50 foot top band inverted-L can be base loaded on 500 kHz using a 500 kHz inductor. Given an inductor Q of 300 and ground loss of 20 ohms
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00194.html (8,001 bytes)

76. Re: Topband: TB season (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 09:09:21 -0600
I think we need a July contest. _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
/archives//html/Topband/2012-03/msg00106.html (9,053 bytes)

77. Re: Topband: TB season (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 09:44:51 -0600
Thanks Sam, I didn't know about the summer Stew. I'll be there. _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
/archives//html/Topband/2012-03/msg00108.html (8,730 bytes)

78. Re: Topband: July Stew Perry Please!!!! (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 10:31:07 -0600
I beleive there is the issue holding the June Stew on Field Day; there will not be many serious efforts on top band. Do we need four hour top band contests or an occasional QSO party? Something less
/archives//html/Topband/2012-03/msg00143.html (9,094 bytes)

79. Re: Topband: July Stew Perry Please!!!! (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 12:06:54 -0600
Perhaps during the summer months we should forgo QRP. _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
/archives//html/Topband/2012-03/msg00148.html (10,266 bytes)

80. Re: Topband: It is not so much propagation (score: 1)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 10:18:38 -0600
To me top band seems to be all about DXing. I can find plenty of if folks calling CQ DX but I don't hear many folks calling just plain CQ. _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ..
/archives//html/Topband/2012-03/msg00175.html (9,638 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu