- 1. Re: Topband: AAARRRAAGH ##$!@@!! (score: 1)
- Author: "JOHN" <shore1@xplornet.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 11:27:26 -0800
- I still find it hard to believe that with the advent of antenna analyzers, dummy loads, wattmeters, etc, that there is the need to tune up on any frequency at all. Every amateur should have in their
- /archives//html/Topband/2009-11/msg00095.html (9,837 bytes)
- 2. Re: Topband: The band was alive - (score: 1)
- Author: "JOHN" <shore1@xplornet.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 18:09:32 -0800
- Hi, I am new to topband, where can I find these "fish beacons"? many thanks! _______________________________________________ 160 meters is a serious band, it should be treated with respect. - TF4M
- /archives//html/Topband/2009-11/msg00434.html (8,705 bytes)
- 3. Re: Topband: inverted L pointers please (score: 1)
- Author: "John" <shore1@xplornet.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 19:25:13 -0800
- I too would like some advice on how to go about building one, I have a 30ft tower here to utilize as well, so that my meager 100w radio will be usable on 160m once again..... was using a longwire but
- /archives//html/Topband/2009-12/msg00097.html (8,038 bytes)
- 4. Re: Topband: European SDR on 160 meters (score: 1)
- Author: "John" <shore1@xplornet.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 07:08:46 -0800
- I totaly agree, this is cheating plain and simple.... the same as one claiming a qso/qsl using the internet on something like CQ100... (I have heard someone actually trying this) and using an SDR is
- /archives//html/Topband/2010-01/msg00013.html (8,668 bytes)
- 5. Re: Topband: Band coming alive (score: 1)
- Author: "John" <shore1@xplornet.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 07:14:15 -0700
- This is an excellent idea..... would make it easier for the newbie to learn and have fun as they did so...... -- Original Message -- From: <kd6nrp@earthlink.net> To: <topband@contesting.com> Sent: Th
- /archives//html/Topband/2010-08/msg00046.html (11,238 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu