Mail Archive Search: <+from:s56a@bit.si>

Results:

References: [ +from:s56a@bit.si: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Re: Noise floor (score: 1): Author: artinian" <s56a@bit.si (artinian); Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2000 15:49:49 -0000; I am sorry for a late reply but I was in Tuscany for a week. Met Carlo, I5JVA www.antenna.it and saw monstrous quads superbly mechanically designed. Really no need as there is plenty of data availabl; /archives//html/Topband/2000-09/msg00014.html (8,096 bytes)
2. Topband: 160m RX (score: 1): Author: artinian" <s56a@bit.si (artinian); Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2000 19:10:21 -0000; This seems to be beloved subject of MW DX community! W8JI claims: I wonder why one needs 12,6 nV sensitivity up to 50 MHz? Using wrong oversensitive semiconductors for GHz range? G3RPB explained the; /archives//html/Topband/2000-08/msg00088.html (7,204 bytes)
3. Topband: Re: 160m RX (score: 1): Author: artinian" <s56a@bit.si (artinian); Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 06:31:33 -0000; W8JI: I wonder if God has spared Georgia of galactic noise? If not, 10 uV sensitivity is more then enough for 160m. This leaves plenty of room for a good input filtering permitting much greater input; /archives//html/Topband/2000-08/msg00090.html (9,750 bytes)
4. No subject (score: 1): Author: artinian" <s56a@bit.si (artinian); Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 21:05:49 -0000; IMD are caused by third order products! 10 dB attenuator would reduce IMD by 30 dB. 10 dB of excesive gain would increase IMD by 30 dB... I am still waiting for the measurements of 160m night signal; /archives//html/Topband/2000-08/msg00102.html (6,804 bytes)
5. Topband: Re: 160m Receivers - the argument for true DSP (long) (score: 1): Author: "Marijan Miletic" <s56a@bit.si>; Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 22:19:50 -0000; I know that USA suffer from NIH (noz invented here) symptomps but I'd expect UK expats to know about an excellent SM Linux radio project. Demands on 2 m low noise band with high gain antennas are way; /archives//html/Topband/2003-10/msg00169.html (6,736 bytes)
6. Topband: Re: 160 Meter BALUNS (score: 1): Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>; Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 00:00:37 -0000; Open air coax balun data is available from WF3T classic article at: http://www.k1ttt.net/technote/airbalun.html Season greetings & 73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU ____________________________________________; /archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00199.html (6,732 bytes)
7. Topband: Balun Discussions (score: 1): Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>; Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2004 22:29:59 -0000; resonance is quite different from the one at low frequencies, and there is only one possible reason: standing waves on a transmission line. Your debate with I4JMY reminds me of Einstein relativistic; /archives//html/Topband/2004-01/msg00019.html (8,272 bytes)
8. Topband: Key Clicks (score: 1): Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>; Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 22:44:11 -0000; Once upon a time Yaesu had to add a single 100 Ohms resistor to D audio output in order to prevent speaker click when headphones were unpluged. Now they should change two SMD 10 nF capacitors to 100; /archives//html/Topband/2004-01/msg00044.html (7,404 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]