Mail Archive Search: <+from:rstealey@hotmail.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:rstealey@hotmail.com: 55 ]

Total 55 documents matching your query.

41. Re: Topband: Effect of trees- tree appreciation (score: 1): Author: Rick Stealey <rstealey@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 16:20:24 +0000; So your loss is less than 3 db, and so it's of no concern to you? I know 160 meter ops who would, and do, pay lots of money for an extra 3 db. Say your tree loss was really 5 db (or even 10) you wou; /archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00092.html (8,166 bytes)
42. Re: Topband: Effect of trees- tree appreciation (score: 1): Author: Rick Stealey <rstealey@hotmail.com>; Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2013 15:16:39 +0000; This is a a very significant statement when you think about it. Ask anyone you talk to on the air how he likes his antenna. Most will say they like it, it's doing great. Ask them how they know. If th; /archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00114.html (9,147 bytes)
43. Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1): Author: Rick Stealey <rstealey@hotmail.com>; Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2013 14:53:59 +0000; If you guys will remember from a year ago, Don is the man who pinpoints these sources, if given a few more, reliable, data points. What is needed are reports from directional loops. 2-3 feet in diam; /archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00057.html (10,296 bytes)
44. Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1): Author: Rick Stealey <rstealey@hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2013 02:12:15 +0000; Everyone is measuring the 3501.6 signal only, right? The other ones, if they exist are in the noise for me, central NJ. I heard the 3501.6 from 10 am till I had to QRT at 3 pm, S3 on a dipole. It is; /archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00067.html (9,269 bytes)
45. Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1): Author: Rick Stealey <rstealey@hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2013 03:26:14 +0000; Any mobile station traveling the I-95 corridor could provide some very interesting data, very easily. What mile marker does the signal peak at? Then we take a loop and start driving around the swamp; /archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00073.html (8,758 bytes)
46. Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1): Author: Rick Stealey <rstealey@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 01:31:31 +0000; They just went away.............? Now what the heck are we going to do for fun, operate the silly radios on the quiet band? K2XT _________________ Topband Reflector; /archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00120.html (9,379 bytes)
47. Re: Topband: That 1.9 MHz radar signal... (score: 1): Author: Rick Stealey <rstealey@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 00:45:21 +0000; In order to identify the location of the transmitter by radio methods (as opposed to Doug's contacts identifying the culprit) it is eventually going to require some more accurate antenna patterns tha; /archives//html/Topband/2014-12/msg00202.html (10,780 bytes)
48. Topband: Use of remote receivers (score: 1): Author: Rick Stealey <rstealey@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 14:01:43 +0000; I haven't seen this aspect of the subject covered - the impact on "the other station." Say I am a little pistol in NJ, and I try to work a station with a big signal out on the west coast. He's having; /archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00103.html (7,401 bytes)
49. Re: Topband: Low Loops, Tee's and ... (score: 1): Author: Rick Stealey <rstealey@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 16:02:08 +0000; W8JI writes:good A-B test, so it really boils down to what makes us happy. If we are happy, it is like magic. It is as good as an extra 10 dB. This is true no matter how our antennas actually work. :; /archives//html/Topband/2015-07/msg00002.html (6,703 bytes)
50. Re: Topband: 4 square (score: 1): Author: Rick Stealey <rstealey@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 15:40:28 +0000; Get some gas tubes from Mouser. I use 652-2049-12-BT1LF. 62 cents each last time I ordered about a year ago. Any surges are shorted around the device (resistor or transformer). The gas tubes have no; /archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00199.html (8,114 bytes)
51. Re: Topband: 1809.2 kHz constant dashes (score: 1): Author: Rick Stealey <rstealey@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 23:09:06 +0000; I'm going to blame this one on the ARRL. In fact we might even call it the "1809 ARRL 24 hour dash." Why, you ask? Because it MIGHT have been caused by the operator mistakenly leaving his copy of QST; /archives//html/Topband/2016-12/msg00121.html (8,722 bytes)
52. Re: Topband: 160 power (score: 1): Author: Rick Stealey <rstealey@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 14:11:31 +0000; What? Mike, 1500 watts is 5 db more signal than you have now. If you can hear better, such that you aren't getting out well enough why would you think 5 db more wouldn't benefit you? 5 db is HUGE. Yo; /archives//html/Topband/2017-03/msg00079.html (7,921 bytes)
53. Re: Topband: 160 meter L (score: 1): Author: Rick Stealey <rstealey@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 17:44:22 +0000; I think a better option is to mount a trap at the top and run a single horizontal wire for the 160 portion. This way you wouldn't be concerned about the 80 meter vertical coupling into the 160 antenn; /archives//html/Topband/2017-03/msg00081.html (7,320 bytes)
54. Re: Topband: Biodegradable staples (score: 1): Author: Rick Stealey <rstealey@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2018 20:29:56 +0000; You should never use steel staples in the ground. Think for a minute. They are sharp, rusty objects that stay a long time. Imagine a barefoot child playing in the area (after you are SK possibly). Im; /archives//html/Topband/2018-06/msg00034.html (9,661 bytes)
55. Re: Topband: Biodegradable staples (score: 1): Author: Rick Stealey <rstealey@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2018 00:31:21 +0000; Oh, cactus plants, huh? Your situation is simple - just tie the radial off to the cactus. Problem solved. Simple! Rick K2XT I want to see a barefoot child running around my cactus patch. And what, pr; /archives//html/Topband/2018-06/msg00037.html (9,487 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 55
Page: [1] [2] [3]