Mail Archive Search: <+from:riel@surriel.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:riel@surriel.com: 46 ]

Total 46 documents matching your query.

41. Re: Topband: ARRL Board Requests Member Comments About Digital Modes (score: 1): Author: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>; Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 10:49:23 -0500; Apparently you did not read that URL. They're not even asking for 1810 to 1840. Equating RM-11708 with something the proposed band plan from the URL above DOES NOT EVEN ASK FOR, and giving that as a; /archives//html/Topband/2014-03/msg00031.html (10,031 bytes)
42. Re: Topband: Ladder line vs coax loss epiphany (score: 1): Author: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 11:16:46 -0400; It is surprisingly easy to make one's own ladder line, on a budget, from materials that are locally available. I have made ladder line from 12ga THHN wire, 1/4 tubing, UV resistant zip ties, and supe; /archives//html/Topband/2014-04/msg00114.html (9,213 bytes)
43. Re: Topband: duo-band 80m/160m antenna (score: 1): Author: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 17:10:22 -0400; What about two seperate antennas with a common feed? Have the 80 as a vertical and the 160 spaced from it a foot or so and then go to a L or T at the top? The double L antenna is just that: http://w; /archives//html/Topband/2014-06/msg00075.html (7,425 bytes)
44. Re: Topband: Modeling the proverbial "vertical on a beach" (score: 1): Author: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>; Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 12:17:20 -0400; One big question is, where does the path loss on top band come from? Is the path loss due to energy lost with each hop? If so, bending some of the radiation around the earth a little bit, and reducin; /archives//html/Topband/2014-08/msg00234.html (11,105 bytes)
45. Re: Topband: New digital mode? (score: 1): Author: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>; Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2016 16:24:25 -0400; You are hearing JT9. The WSJTX software can decode both JT65 and JT9 at the same time, if you select JT9+JT65 as the mode. 73 de AB1KW -- All rights reversed _________________ Topband Reflector Arch; /archives//html/Topband/2016-10/msg00006.html (7,873 bytes)
46. Re: Topband: 160 vertical/L (score: 1): Author: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 11:22:43 -0500; The easiest thing to do might be to add a second wire for 80m. Lifting a (fiberglass?) spreader to keep that second wire at a distance should not add all that much weight. -- All Rights Reversed. ___; /archives//html/Topband/2016-11/msg00181.html (8,017 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 46
Page: [1] [2] [3]