Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:paul@n1bug.com: 91 ]

Total 91 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Topband: Noise problem question (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 18:29:48 -0500
When I got back on topband in 2002 I discovered the band had been invaded by what might best be described as unstable growls, each about 3 kHz wide, between 1810 and 1820. There used to be several, t
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00469.html (8,667 bytes)

22. Re: Topband: Another good LP day on Top (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 08:40:03 -0500
DU and BU were 559 or better here in Maine this morning. That is by far the best I have ever heard either of them. Unfortunately I made no contacts as I only had brief moments free of devastating QRM
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00601.html (6,789 bytes)

23. Topband: BC filters and inductance calculations (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 06:18:02 -0500
Two unrelated questions: A recent improvement to my station has brought other issues to the forefront. I am going to need a serious filter to keep AM BC stations out of my preamp. I had been thinking
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00068.html (7,778 bytes)

24. Topband: BC filters - the rest of the story (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 18:26:28 -0500
I have received MANY excellent responses and am still working my way through them. Quite a number asked for specifics of my problem. I thought I would post that here in case someone may have other he
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00080.html (8,519 bytes)

25. Re: Topband: MFJ Noise Canceller 1026/1025 (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 07:01:13 -0500
Many of the DX stations I have worked for "new ones" would have been totally inaudible if my noise floor had been an S-unit higher. Both my present and former MFJ-1026 units had the high noise floor
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00088.html (8,033 bytes)

26. Topband: BC filter follow-up (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 09:05:53 -0500
Thanks to everyone who sent suggestions on my problem. Those who did not receive a personal thank-you note is because mail to you bounced. I thought it might be helpful to post a follow-up with links
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00092.html (8,905 bytes)

27. Topband: BCI chase update (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2012 12:45:30 -0500
Prompted by Roger, N1RJ, I decided to do some digging around. Aided by isolating specific stages of my receive signal path as much as possible, and using precision 3 and 6 dB pads at various points t
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00124.html (8,443 bytes)

28. Re: Topband: BCI chase update (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 08:00:13 -0500
Clarification: Actually what I had in mind was to place the short at the input of the preamp. I want the preamp protected too. My only concern is the preamp might want to oscillate with a short on it
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00134.html (7,612 bytes)

29. Topband: Extending MFJ-1026 phase range (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 08:32:33 -0500
One final thing. I promise to shut up after this. My next project is to do the W8JI mods on my MFJ-1026. Has anyone tried extending the phase range of the MFJ-1025/1026 by adding a capacitor in the p
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00141.html (6,521 bytes)

30. Re: Topband: Unintentional QRM on TB (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:49:24 -0500
While it may not be an every day thing, this is common enough on topband so that anyone seriously attempting to work DX there should be familiar with what is meant. "12" is short for "QSX 12" which
/archives//html/Topband/2012-01/msg00308.html (7,729 bytes)

31. Re: Topband: Radials help (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:50:13 -0500
I haven't been following this entire thread, but this caught my eye just now. Sometimes you do what you can and blindly hope for the best. My radial field consists of about 100 radials (I get a diff
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00113.html (9,819 bytes)

32. Re: Topband: LOTW Participation (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 10:32:04 -0500
Thank you Julius. I am known as a "dinosaur" to my friends. I do not readily adopt new technologies and ways of doing things. But LoTW is my salvation, lest I leave the hobby altogether. I upload 10
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00258.html (9,099 bytes)

33. Re: Topband: LOTW Participation (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 11:01:06 -0500
This will be my final on the subject, but let me just attempt once more to plant a seed for possible thought. I totally agree an electronic notification is just not the same, but it may be all your
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00263.html (10,006 bytes)

34. Re: Topband: 3C6A (propagation) (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 09:05:32 -0500
Perhaps not all of us. This brings up a mystery I have been wondering about for years. I seem to be experiencing something that most of NA doesn't. Admittedly the sample size is small, since activity
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00360.html (8,375 bytes)

35. Re: Topband: 3C6A (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:30:12 -0500
Agreed! Which prompts me to ask, what is it about 3C / 3C0 that I don't know? Are there exclusive travel restrictions? I am wondering why there hasn't been a major DXpedition or a topband focused op
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00367.html (7,947 bytes)

36. Topband: 3C prop & travel - THANKS (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 07:36:50 -0500
Sorry for this post. Just a THANK YOU to all who replied on & off list to my questions about propagation and travel to 3C/3C0. I have fallen behind in the affairs of daily life and may not get indivi
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00447.html (6,599 bytes)

37. Re: Topband: How Good is Good Enough? (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:22:25 -0400
Or you've been forced into some other bad situation. I have a local noise problem that is beyond my control. Unfortunately I can't afford the DXE noise canceller so I got an MFJ. With my ~600 foot B
/archives//html/Topband/2012-03/msg00042.html (9,236 bytes)

38. Re: Topband: Fw: Deterring Critters was:Re: How Good is Good Enough? (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 07:09:40 -0400
The stuff the telephone company uses for drops here is 2 x #18 copperweld with very thick insulation (not sure what material). It is made like zip cord and is easily separated into two single insula
/archives//html/Topband/2012-03/msg00070.html (8,300 bytes)

39. Re: Topband: Fw: Deterring Critters was:Re: How Good is Good Enough? (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 18:47:23 -0400
Forget it. I've been trying to rid my area of squirrels for years, because they insist on chewing holes in my house! But there is a never-ending supply of replacement squirrels. Paul ________________
/archives//html/Topband/2012-03/msg00077.html (9,298 bytes)

40. Re: Topband: Deterring Critters (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 19:25:49 -0400
Yes, and it seems to deter them. I was using regular PVC RG-59 cable for Beverage feeds for a while. It was constantly getting munched by critters. Since switching to RG-6 with a PE jacket three year
/archives//html/Topband/2012-03/msg00079.html (9,879 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu