Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:on5zo@telenet.be: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: 160m choke issue (score: 1)
Author: "Franki ON5ZO" <on5zo@telenet.be>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 23:03:13 +0200
Dear TopBanders Long intro to take the bull by the horns in the end. To finally get a better DX performance on 160, I converted my superb 80m CW antenna to "an elevated inverted L with a bunch of ele
/archives//html/Topband/2009-07/msg00143.html (9,774 bytes)

2. Topband: Make 80m vertical work on 160 (score: 1)
Author: "Franki ON5ZO" <on5zo@telenet.be>
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 20:28:32 +0200
Gentlemen, please your advice. If I were to convert my working resonant 80m vertical into a 80/160m antenna, I assume I have two basic options according to the literature: - Use a trap to 'split' the
/archives//html/Topband/2009-10/msg00076.html (7,450 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Make 80m vertical work on 160 (score: 1)
Author: "Franki ON5ZO" <on5zo@telenet.be>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:41:00 +0200
Hello TopBanders! In reply to my own posting a fortnight ago, I'd like to thank each and everyone offering advice and insights. It seems that each of the options (loading coils, lineair loading and t
/archives//html/Topband/2009-10/msg00166.html (10,596 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu