- 21. Topband: DXCC committe (score: 1)
- Author: Jarda <ok1rd@ok1rd.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 16:49:14 +0100
- O.K. guys. watching the discussion about " my matter " and let me specify that material QSL is exactly same as I have from other band it means there is a label over clean basic QSL confirmed over by
- /archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00271.html (7,771 bytes)
- 22. Topband: DXCC Committee (score: 1)
- Author: Jarda <ok1rd@ok1rd.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 20:54:46 +0100
- 1/Y/ou want to say that such a tricky way (presenting a fake card without an application) should go unpunished? // //Nick, UY0ZG /Nick Nick you must hate me very much Hi. There was no trick in my int
- /archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00280.html (10,547 bytes)
- 23. Topband: Who is ruling DXCC ? (score: 1)
- Author: Jarda <ok1rd@ok1rd.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 08:39:12 +0100
- Gentlemen, remember: /On March 4, 2020, we received a QSL Card that you submitted to ARRL for an OK1RD 160-Meter CW credit (a QSL Card claiming a QSO with Jarvis Island dated April 15, 1990). That or
- /archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00312.html (10,407 bytes)
- 24. Topband: Appendix to previous E-mail (score: 1)
- Author: Jarda <ok1rd@ok1rd.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 09:18:46 +0100
- Bart, plus, you are, as comes from the discussion at Topband contesting.com you deliberately stated *"**The card you supplied includes a white adhesive label - applied over the original card QSO info
- /archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00313.html (7,224 bytes)
- 25. Topband: Last comment (score: 1)
- Author: Jarda <ok1rd@ok1rd.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 09:32:24 +0100
- If any of the DXmans would be in the mood to read the facts about my "exclusion" from the ARRL, then please read my page section. Here you will find facts supported by correspondence. We all know, th
- /archives//html/Topband/2020-03/msg00341.html (7,117 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu