Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n6pe@pacbell.net: 43 ]

Total 43 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Vertical antenna technical help (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Darwicki" <n6pe@pacbell.net>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 19:20:03 -0800
Can anyone help with this question regarding my vertical antenna for 160 ? I have a Create 40/80 mounted about 20' above the ground on a metal pipe. The antenna has two plastic insulator sleeves and
/archives//html/Topband/2005-01/msg00355.html (7,370 bytes)

2. Topband: EZNEC prediction help (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Darwicki" <n6pe@pacbell.net>
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 12:52:37 -0800
Can anyone familiar with EZNEC please give me a hand? The program is very accurate, at least when I modeled my Create 40/80 vertical the predicted results were right on the money with actual readings
/archives//html/Topband/2005-02/msg00114.html (7,960 bytes)

3. Topband: EZNEC shunt fed tower file (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Darwicki" <n6pe@pacbell.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 19:29:48 -0800
I have a 35' tubular tower with a tribander on top. Wonder if someone could please send me an EZNEC file which models something similar. I want to play with the matching rod spacing, connection point
/archives//html/Topband/2005-02/msg00142.html (6,486 bytes)

4. Topband: Loop (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Darwicki" <n6pe@pacbell.net>
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 09:25:04 -0800
It appears I have line noise from one direction that I need to null. Can anyone suggest a small loop or ??? say 5-8 ft max in spread that has a deep null in just one direction? Preamp and rotor is no
/archives//html/Topband/2005-02/msg00149.html (6,771 bytes)

5. Topband: Loop (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Darwicki" <n6pe@pacbell.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 11:10:16 -0800
Thanks to all who suggested the 5' per side RX loop. I just tuned my 5' loop without a preamp and can null the S-5 noise reading to 0. It has the suggest balun and is just a few feet off the ground I
/archives//html/Topband/2005-02/msg00154.html (6,919 bytes)

6. Topband: Interesting bulbs (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Darwicki" <n6pe@pacbell.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 13:43:16 -0800
I recently replaced my 4-foot garage lights with some cheap new fixtures. Flipping the lights on generates +30 db noise on 160 meters. I got tired of having to beat the XYL every time she took a load
/archives//html/Topband/2005-03/msg00036.html (7,874 bytes)

7. Topband: PJ2T (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Darwicki" <n6pe@pacbell.net>
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 10:58:27 -0800
I was beginning to wonder if So Cal was in a propagation hole or if 400-600 miles really makes a difference. I've noticed guys in northern California hearing/working guys I don't hear. Last night I h
/archives//html/Topband/2005-03/msg00054.html (7,040 bytes)

8. Topband: Condx from So Cal (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Darwicki" <n6pe@pacbell.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 07:11:37 -0800
Woke up about 4 am and listened..... very exciting: 3NBO fish net buoy N4SF calling cq W7LR worked a JA N6NKS/B 5W was S-7 If any of you DX stations answered my CQ, I didn't hear you. Rick -= N6PE =-
/archives//html/Topband/2005-03/msg00196.html (6,351 bytes)

9. Topband: TS-940S (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Darwicki" <n6pe@pacbell.net>
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 16:42:02 -0700
I have noticed a few times in pile ups while working either split or with XIT on my TS-940 (and the Alpha 78 with both button in), people sending UP UP UP and would swear they are hearing me on the R
/archives//html/Topband/2005-04/msg00022.html (7,096 bytes)

10. Topband: So Cal signals (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Darwicki" <n6pe@pacbell.net>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 08:44:35 -0700
I wonder if anyone else in So. Cal can hear W1AW at 0300 UTC? Last night on my loop it was about 60% copy. On the 40/80 vertical it sounded better, if I put in 10 DB att. On my 30/160 inverted vee at
/archives//html/Topband/2005-04/msg00076.html (6,849 bytes)

11. Topband: 1/2 wave vertical (score: 1)
Author: "Rick N6PE" <n6pe@pacbell.net>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 10:32:36 -0700
Hello all, When matching a 1/2 wave vertical running 100 watts if I use a parallel tuned circuit is it recommended to tap the coax down the coil or link couple it with another winding? Is there a bet
/archives//html/Topband/2005-05/msg00051.html (7,049 bytes)

12. Topband: Inverted L s (score: 1)
Author: "Rick N6PE" <n6pe@pacbell.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 21:54:01 -0700
Considering an inverted L and thinking about the tie points you have on a city lot I did some real rough plots in EZNEC just to see the effect of raising or lowering the end. Figured you tie the end
/archives//html/Topband/2005-06/msg00018.html (7,315 bytes)

13. Topband: FD 160 (score: 1)
Author: "Rick N6PE" <n6pe@pacbell.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 08:32:27 -0700
With the SF 78 A35 K3 there may be more people on 160 than want to be. We usually work a lot of multi-transmitter locals, but not much more. Look for AA6DP 1C LAX from a yacht anchored in Long Beach
/archives//html/Topband/2005-06/msg00039.html (6,290 bytes)

14. Topband: K7C 160 Schedule (score: 1)
Author: "Rick N6PE" <n6pe@pacbell.net>
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 06:43:52 -0700
Hi, Anyone know the K7C schedule for USA on 160? Tnx Rick Darwicki -= N6PE =- == 17775 Elmhurst Circle Yorba Linda, CA 92886 http://www.stores.ebay.com/n6peradiotubes http://www.qsl.net/n6pe/ _______
/archives//html/Topband/2005-10/msg00001.html (6,426 bytes)

15. Topband: Noise level (score: 1)
Author: "Rick N6PE" <n6pe@pacbell.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 19:38:35 -0700
Guys, When you talk about noise on 160 what mode/bandwidth is the one you are supposed to use? On AM my noise is 20 db over 9...... 10 over on SSB and CW and S-5 to S-7 in narrow CW depending on the
/archives//html/Topband/2005-10/msg00024.html (6,811 bytes)

16. Topband: 160 Contest (score: 1)
Author: "Rick N6PE" <n6pe@pacbell.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 13:40:30 -0800
Usually I have been able to copy better on RX with the 30up/80 out L and 20-30 attenuation than on any loop I've tried. This year I used an antique style BC type turn loop in the shack and actually w
/archives//html/Topband/2005-12/msg00223.html (6,927 bytes)

17. Topband: Matching network help (score: 1)
Author: "Rick N6PE" <n6pe@pacbell.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 10:53:16 -0700
Gents, My current 160 antenna (if you can call it that) is an inverted "L" about 32' up and 90 out. I have a coil to ground and tapped the bottom to match the coax feed line and the top to tune the a
/archives//html/Topband/2006-04/msg00058.html (6,678 bytes)

18. Topband: Matching (score: 1)
Author: "Rick N6PE" <n6pe@pacbell.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 09:23:57 -0700
Thanks to all that replied. I looks like running a parallel with for 80 is my best option. Rick Darwicki -= N6PE =- == 17775 Elmhurst Circle Yorba Linda, CA 92886 http://www.stores.ebay.com/n6peradio
/archives//html/Topband/2006-04/msg00062.html (6,347 bytes)

19. Topband: Coil position (score: 1)
Author: "Rick N6PE" <n6pe@pacbell.net>
Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 10:08:33 -0700
Something someone said the other day about a top loading coil on a vertical acting like a mobile antenna raises a question. We have all seen the theory and computer program calculations telling us to
/archives//html/Topband/2006-05/msg00017.html (7,255 bytes)

20. Topband: Kinstar AM Radio Station Antenna Design (score: 1)
Author: "Rick N6PE" <n6pe@pacbell.net>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 08:05:16 -0700
I was wondering if anyone has experimented with the Kintronic Inc antenna design? It is a 0.05 wave high AM radio station monopole, effectively 4 inverted "L"s close together (10 feet) fed with simpl
/archives//html/Topband/2006-05/msg00058.html (6,971 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]
This search system is powered by Namazu