Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n1rj@roadrunner.com: 107 ]

Total 107 documents matching your query.

101. Topband: Blatant cheating using Remote Operation (score: 1)
Author: Roger D Johnson <n1rj@roadrunner.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2019 13:21:19 -0400
There is no way an organization such as the ARRL can prevent cheating in the DXCC program. It has to depend on the honesty of the hams involved. Yes..some people will cheat but I can't see how they c
/archives//html/Topband/2019-10/msg00071.html (7,651 bytes)

102. Re: Topband: Blatant cheating using Remote Operation (score: 1)
Author: Roger D Johnson <n1rj@roadrunner.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2019 18:23:35 -0400
I've been saying this for years! It's pretty clear in the regs: § 97.119 Station identification. (a) Each amateur station, except a space station or telecommand station, must transmit its assigned ca
/archives//html/Topband/2019-10/msg00080.html (15,703 bytes)

103. Topband: Amateur Radio Station Callsigns (score: 1)
Author: Roger D Johnson <n1rj@roadrunner.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 06:39:17 -0400
Every time the issue of station callsigns comes up I hear all kinds of very inventive distortions of the rules to justify what hams are doing. A quick trip to the FCC site elicited the following unde
/archives//html/Topband/2019-10/msg00089.html (7,226 bytes)

104. Re: Topband: Amateur Radio Station Callsigns (score: 1)
Author: Roger D Johnson <n1rj@roadrunner.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 13:18:20 -0400
This does NOT satisfy the requirements of 97.119(a)! Give us the FCC part number that allows the type of operation that you describe here. Roger N1RJ On 10/13/2019 12:32 PM, m.r.c. wrote: Part of the
/archives//html/Topband/2019-10/msg00099.html (8,055 bytes)

105. Topband: Grounds (score: 1)
Author: Roger D Johnson <n1rj@roadrunner.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 11:36:46 -0400
I wish there some sort of inoculation that hams could get that would allow them to discern the difference between a power line safety ground (required by code) and a lightning ground that is designed
/archives//html/Topband/2019-10/msg00151.html (6,985 bytes)

106. Re: Topband: Any Linrad selective limiter noise blanker experts here? (score: 1)
Author: Roger D Johnson <n1rj@roadrunner.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 11:05:50 -0500
This may be of help. New product for MFJ? 73, Roger In a quiet non-contest topband session, my rig's noise blanker does a very decent job eliminating the 120Hz impulses. I have to operate many kc awa
/archives//html/Topband/2020-01/msg00292.html (10,475 bytes)

107. Re: Topband: Any Linrad selective limiter noise blanker experts here? (score: 1)
Author: Roger D Johnson <n1rj@roadrunner.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 11:06:35 -0500
Darn! Forgot the URL! http://www.ka7oei.com/syn_blank.html 73, Roger In a quiet non-contest topband session, my rig's noise blanker does a very decent job eliminating the 120Hz impulses. I have to op
/archives//html/Topband/2020-01/msg00294.html (10,387 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu