Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:mikewate@gmail.com: 1106 ]

Total 1106 documents matching your query.

201. Re: Topband: Lightning QRN season? (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 18:23:23 -0500
Well said, Jim! Sounds like that "syndrome" you mention might be related to *Topband Disease* ;-) The link to that is now 404, but I have it copied to http://www.w0btu.com/160_meters.html near the bo
/archives//html/Topband/2013-07/msg00103.html (8,971 bytes)

202. Re: Topband: 160M Rhombics (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 19:58:40 -0500
?????????????? _________________ Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2013-07/msg00106.html (7,035 bytes)

203. Re: Topband: 160 (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 08:57:10 -0500
I've noticed that at http://www.dxscape.com/us160cw.html . Seems like activity is picking up, I'll have to drag my carcass out of bed some morning and join the fun there. :-) 73. Mike www.w0btu.com _
/archives//html/Topband/2013-07/msg00146.html (7,164 bytes)

204. Re: Topband: Wireless Internet RFI Issue (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 12:43:00 -0500
Not too long ago there was a good discussion about this. Try searching for DSL at http://lists.contesting.com/archives//html/Topband/ . 73, Mike www.w0btu.com _________________ Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2013-07/msg00151.html (7,146 bytes)

205. Topband: Signal attenuation from foliage near 160m antenna (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 21:21:47 -0500
This subject has been discussed here plenty of times in the past, and the consensus has always been that trees and other foliage near a 160m antenna has a negligible effect on the transmitted signal.
/archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00003.html (7,573 bytes)

206. Re: Topband: Signal attenuation from foliage near 160m antenna (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 20:05:23 -0500
I *very much* appreciate the many replies to my post. I've known about the effect of foliage at VHF and above for a long time, but I think I've just learned something new and useful. :-) Since the ve
/archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00013.html (12,223 bytes)

207. Re: Topband: tree losses (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2013 13:04:16 -0500
Bingo! Just because the military does (or did) something with antennas doesn't means it's good for us all to repeat. There was a discussion some time back that a Beverage must make a good transmittin
/archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00043.html (8,816 bytes)

208. Re: Topband: tree losses (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2013 13:31:54 -0500
Hi Tim, Here's how I did it. http://www.w0btu.com/Beverage_antennas.html#transmitting_on_a_Beverage I left the termination resistor off, and it still had a 5 dB F/B ratio. I also connected the two wi
/archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00052.html (9,643 bytes)

209. Re: Topband: tree losses (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2013 21:45:52 -0500
Am I? Okay. Sorry. :-) Nothing at all wrong with an experiment. But ONE of the things I was thinking of (but didn't mention) was a publication by the military (about transmitting on a Beverage) that
/archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00070.html (10,597 bytes)

210. Re: Topband: Effect of trees- tree appreciation (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2013 14:52:07 -0500
This is a VERY profound piece of advice! The RBN showed me that something was definitely wrong with my TX signal level this summer. It was considerably down from several other stations not that far a
/archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00119.html (9,216 bytes)

211. Re: Topband: Vertical vs inverted L question/opinions (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2013 16:48:30 -0500
That's exactly what I was thinking. Top load it and forget about a loading coil at the base. 73, Mike www.w0btu.com _________________ Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00121.html (7,049 bytes)

212. Re: Topband: Effect of trees- tree appreciation (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2013 19:11:07 -0500
I'm not sure if there's a tutorial, but let me see if we call help a little. Since I probably have cookies saved from using them, you may experience something a little different. Click http://www.rev
/archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00126.html (9,753 bytes)

213. Re: Topband: Zo of an individual CAT5 twisted pair (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 19:22:25 -0500
Maybe I'm too easily entertained, but I think it would be fun to try 1500W+ through it on 160 sometime. Years ago, I did that with RG-58C/U on 10 meters. Just because I could. :-) Not that I plan on
/archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00161.html (10,025 bytes)

214. Re: Topband: Lightning QRN season? (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 22:29:30 -0500
Tonight was a perfect example of that. N2RK called CQ DX for the longest time, and he had a great S/N ratio from multiple stations on the RBN, including GW8IZR. I spotted him on the cluster, and so d
/archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00165.html (8,641 bytes)

215. Re: Topband: Beverage over Inverted L (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 23:18:52 -0500
Back-to-back diodes and series lamps help, too. 73, Mike www.w0btu.com _________________ Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00167.html (6,809 bytes)

216. Re: Topband: RX antenna transformer winding (pure resistance transformation issues) (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 14:36:25 -0500
If I can add my $0.02 worth here... I have never found a better ferrite core for RX antenna transformers than the Amidon BN-73-202 (Fair-Rite 2873000202). I also used to use side-by-side stacked ferr
/archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00236.html (8,702 bytes)

217. Re: Topband: RX antenna transformer winding (pure resistance transformation issues) (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 15:38:12 -0500
That is for sure. I was following a thread in an SWL or AM BCB group a few months ago, where someone (right or wrong) was recommending a toroid as an antenna in lieu of a ferrite rod with wire wrappe
/archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00239.html (9,192 bytes)

218. Re: Topband: Radials in the pond..? (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 10:12:06 -0500
Here's some material about that, as well as some links. www.w0btu.com/Optimum_number_of_ground_radials_vs_radial_length.html 73, Mike www.w0btu.com _________________ Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00262.html (8,027 bytes)

219. Re: Topband: Two 2:1 transformers to choose from!! (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 10:21:14 -0500
P. 7-69 of Low Band Dxing (5th ed.) by ON4UN says a maximum of 4 turns on the low-Z primary for binocular cores. It might work, but there are other turns ratios you might try. Here is a list of turns
/archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00263.html (8,194 bytes)

220. Re: Topband: Two 2:1 transformers to choose from!! (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 20:51:57 -0500
That is EXACTLY what I have experienced here. 73, Mike www.w0btu.com _________________ Topband Reflector
/archives//html/Topband/2013-08/msg00273.html (8,980 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu