Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:midnight18@cox.net: 129 ]

Total 129 documents matching your query.

21. Topband: DX-Enginneering Active Antenna System (score: 1)
Author: Bob Kile <midnight18@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 06:05:35 -0700
Greetings All, I've been looking into active RX antenna arrays for receive only low band operation. Interested in the DX Engineering type ( DXE-ARAV2-4P ) with (DXE- RFS-2P) in 4 square configuration
/archives//html/Topband/2009-09/msg00092.html (7,223 bytes)

22. Re: Topband: DX-Enginneering Active Antenna System (score: 1)
Author: Bob Kile <midnight18@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:30:59 -0700
Guys, Thanks to all those who responded to my question about the active antennas and arrays of the same. I started responding but did not realize that there were so many posts that I could write all
/archives//html/Topband/2009-09/msg00097.html (7,421 bytes)

23. Topband: RTTY Contests on 160 (score: 1)
Author: Bob Kile <midnight18@cox.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:00:19 -0700
While RTTY is not my mode of operation, "I prefer CW", there is no reason to prohibit or discourage a contest of this type a couple times a year providing that in general this type of communication h
/archives//html/Topband/2009-10/msg00402.html (7,079 bytes)

24. Re: Topband: The East Coast Advantage (score: 1)
Author: Bob Kile <midnight18@cox.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:52:23 -0700
The East Coast contest advantage discussion appears every year. The bottom line is it is a fact. The only way to correct it is to move East! I have no intentions of doing that as I like our wide open
/archives//html/Topband/2009-10/msg00404.html (10,088 bytes)

25. Topband: AAARRRAAGH ##$!@@!! (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Kile (W7RH)" <midnight18@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 20:13:21 -0800
We as a people have become too politically correct. Yes there are tuners, you can watch them sweep the band. However I don't believe this was the case. It's that time of the year when this jerk or je
/archives//html/Topband/2009-11/msg00096.html (8,550 bytes)

26. Re: Topband: WAS on 160 meters in three (3) days (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Kile (W7RH)" <midnight18@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:07:16 -0800
Heya Milt, WAS in ARRL 160 op time 08:41 . Last two AH6V 0527Z, and AL9A 0641Z Darned good first night.. 73 Bob, W7RH -- Bob Kile, W7RH DM35OS -- Linux is like living in a teepee. No Windows, No Gate
/archives//html/Topband/2009-12/msg00185.html (8,031 bytes)

27. Topband: Top Band Interference (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Kile (W7RH)" <midnight18@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:25:21 -0800
Greetings guys, The Stew Perry contest is days away. I have a request for our honorary group. For the past few years we have had a poor bored loner who likes to jam or interfere with stations working
/archives//html/Topband/2009-12/msg00238.html (7,236 bytes)

28. Topband: Correlation between AM BCB propagation and topband? (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Kile (W7RH)" <midnight18@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 20:01:27 -0800
Regarding Ricks' comments on KKOH Reno, and WBBM Detroit. Being and old broadcast guy , MW band SWL and a talk show listener. I would conclude that propagation for the Detroit haul was very good. Re:
/archives//html/Topband/2010-01/msg00068.html (7,086 bytes)

29. Topband: Loud clicks (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Kile (W7RH)" <midnight18@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 20:23:52 -0800
I will agree that there was a significant increase in key clicks and other spurious noises in recent contests even with a few who were quote" running low power". There have been many fine suggestions
/archives//html/Topband/2010-01/msg00070.html (8,318 bytes)

30. Re: Topband: Question for the EXPERTS and Heavy Transceiver users and testers (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Kile (W7RH)" <midnight18@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 16:26:44 -0700
Greetings Top Band, I follow with interest the threads on antennas and transceivers and thought I would throw in some comments and opinions. I've been teased and jeered by the guys that have spent fo
/archives//html/Topband/2010-04/msg00038.html (8,342 bytes)

31. Re: Topband: 3 element array (score: 1)
Author: W7RH <midnight18@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 20:33:51 -0700
Rag, We had QSO in Winter of 2007 and obviously conditions were quite good at solar minimum. In our qso I was running 100W and using a 3 element end-fire array which is of parasitic origin. I have se
/archives//html/Topband/2010-06/msg00045.html (7,922 bytes)

32. Re: Topband: your opinions (score: 1)
Author: W7RH <midnight18@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 21:27:31 -0700
Larry, Oh boy, here we go! Lot's of land limited budget response would be 8-16 1.5 wavelength beverages for RX. We had 8 of them on the NK7C pivot farm in February CQ 160 SSB. They worked well althou
/archives//html/Topband/2010-07/msg00097.html (7,823 bytes)

33. Topband: Where are the JA stations? (score: 1)
Author: W7RH <midnight18@cox.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 08:02:51 -0800
Fellow Top Banders, I generally operate 4 contests with regularity each year starting with CQWW CW, ARRL 160, Stew Perry and finally the CQWW 160. This year I missed the ARRL 160 because of battery f
/archives//html/Topband/2010-12/msg00092.html (8,171 bytes)

34. Re: Topband: Boring Report - December (score: 1)
Author: W7RH <midnight18@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2011 13:14:35 -0800
Tree, Don't feel like the "Lone Ranger". In my previous post regarding "Where are the JA's" most of the comments have paralleled comments on this thread which at least gives us something to do or tal
/archives//html/Topband/2011-01/msg00037.html (10,756 bytes)

35. Topband: Not sooo Boring Report (score: 1)
Author: W7RH <midnight18@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 08:27:53 -0800
After a two week period of really bad conditions the magical 160m band opened up last night to Europe. In the log HA9RE a relative newcomer to top band and IV3PRK a top band perennial. Both modest ur
/archives//html/Topband/2011-01/msg00051.html (7,482 bytes)

36. Topband: slow speed contester (score: 1)
Author: W7RH <midnight18@cox.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 13:00:10 -0800
I hark what Craig said. There are several opportunities in the next 4 weeks to operate and hone skills. Get on the air Brian, if I can hear you we will definitely have a QSO! 73 Bob, W7RH -- Bob Kile
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00248.html (7,809 bytes)

37. Re: Topband: ARRL 160m, Another Perspective (score: 1)
Author: W7RH <midnight18@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 20:31:49 -0800
Greetings All, I read with interest all the comments thus far about the ARRL 160m contest. As usual Friday afternoon I was copying some weak EU stations (not workable) well before sunset. However, th
/archives//html/Topband/2011-12/msg00122.html (9,280 bytes)

38. Re: Topband: Parasitic Elements with 160m Verticals (score: 1)
Author: W7RH <midnight18@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 20:55:21 -0700
I have been using a five element array of 1/8th wave (43ft) verticals since 2006 on Top band. I feel this is the lower limit to maintain radiation efficiency as each element is at or near 12.5 Ohms i
/archives//html/Topband/2012-05/msg00073.html (7,387 bytes)

39. Re: Topband: Monopole Elev Pattern w.r.t. Earth Conductivity (score: 1)
Author: W7RH <midnight18@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 17:40:06 -0700
I'm intrigued by the number of comments on this thread. I'll offer my two cents as if there are a few who might concur. Size matters only in the length and density of the ground plane elements. Elect
/archives//html/Topband/2012-10/msg00362.html (10,121 bytes)

40. Re: Topband: Outing The Scofflaws (score: 1)
Author: W7RH <midnight18@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 09:58:29 -0800
Kudos to the operators at PT0S for their adjustment to band conditions and volume of callers. I listened for two nights before making the dive into the mayhem. To me the first few nights the operator
/archives//html/Topband/2012-11/msg00183.html (8,885 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu