Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:kolson@rcn.com: 61 ]

Total 61 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Topband: FT-2000 for serious TB DXing? (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Olson" <kolson@rcn.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 10:46:46 -0400
To be fair, almost all of the popular transceivers other than the Orion we have been using are little if any better than the FT-2000 at 2KC spacing. Most just didn't known generally because until re
/archives//html/Topband/2007-06/msg00004.html (10,298 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: FT-2000 for serious TB DXing? (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Olson" <kolson@rcn.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 11:24:08 -0400
Well, let's look at the numbers: FT-1000 MP FT-2000 20Kc 94 db 100 db 5 Kc 76 db 86 db 2 Kc 69 db 63 db Unfortunately, no IP3 was given for the FT-1000, so we can't look at that. As you can see, the
/archives//html/Topband/2007-06/msg00005.html (9,971 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Transceiver for 160 (score: 1)
Author: <kolson@rcn.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 10:44:17 -0400 (EDT)
Best I have used on 160 is Icom 781. But suspect K3 and Orion 2 may be better yet. Kevin K3OX _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.
/archives//html/Topband/2007-10/msg00087.html (7,664 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Out-of-Turn Callers (score: 1)
Author: kolson@rcn.com
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 10:17:19 -0500 (EST)
Frankly, if someone I barely knew sent me a critique of my operating style unsolicited and basically demanded an apology for something he deemed wrong , my reaction would likely be the same. I know t
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00067.html (10,967 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: Missing K1N 160m QSO records just uploaded to Clublog (score: 1)
Author: kolson@rcn.com
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 13:31:17 -0500 (EST)
I think the point was that if you NEVER saw your QSO in Clublog, work again. If you saw it in Clublog before it's still in the logs on the island, so you are OK. Kevin K3OX -- Original Message -- Tre
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00262.html (10,945 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: K1N On Line Log (score: 1)
Author: kolson@rcn.com
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 01:35:36 -0500 (EST)
Charlie, I don't think many here  "didn't know" if they made a contact or not. The question was if  K1N had "lost" their QSO from the computer log. No matter how sure you are you made the contact, if
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00293.html (10,736 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: K1N On Line Log (score: 1)
Author: kolson@rcn.com
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 10:56:52 -0500 (EST)
Charlie, that's my point. The people who keep calling in the pile are AWARE that they may not have a QSO, that's why they keep calling. With all the intentional QRM on K1N, it's possible they were ne
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00315.html (13,970 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: Brave New World (score: 1)
Author: kolson@rcn.com
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 10:29:36 -0500 (EST)
Sometimes it's more in how things are presented. The thing that struck me was how the ARRL looked at it was some kind of triumphant feat when it struck me as, ultimately, kind of sad. It was late in
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00665.html (12,475 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: Brave New World (score: 1)
Author: kolson@rcn.com
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 14:59:41 -0500 (EST)
Actually Jim old boy, I have. I have been a Frankford RC member for 43 years and have operated from many M/M and M/S stations both in the US and as DX. I have a good idea what goes into it and have h
/archives//html/Topband/2015-02/msg00687.html (11,191 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: ZS6BKW(G5RV) on 160m? (score: 1)
Author: kolson@rcn.com
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 01:33:21 -0400 (EDT)
Mike, this is exactly the antenna I use here at the home QTH. Mine is set up as a 92 ft flattop and 42 ft feeder , one end at 50 ft the other at 25 ft (that's what I had to work with). I have a switc
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00204.html (10,726 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: ZS6BKW(G5RV) on 160m? (score: 1)
Author: kolson@rcn.com
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 21:41:07 -0400 (EDT)
Here is what  I would  do. First, build the proposed antenna, set it up at home with the coax connected directly to the ladder line at the bottom, the hot and ground each to one leg. Trim the ladder
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00212.html (17,571 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: ZS6BKW(G5RV) on 160m? (score: 1)
Author: kolson@rcn.com
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 21:54:42 -0400 (EDT)
The ZS6BKW is really a quite different antenna than a G5RV. On 40, 20, 18, 12 and 10 meters, the feedpoint is close enough to 50 ohms to present a good match when properly trimmed . The coax is match
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00213.html (12,479 bytes)

13. Re: Topband: ZS6BKW(G5RV) on 160m? (score: 1)
Author: kolson@rcn.com
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 22:29:33 -0400 (EDT)
It actually is very similar to a G5RV. It just has some length adjustments. I guess one could argue that most antennas are similar, just with length adjustments. Take a 160 ft long wire, cut it up i
/archives//html/Topband/2015-03/msg00215.html (8,210 bytes)

14. Re: Topband: Top Band Antenna (score: 1)
Author: kolson@rcn.com
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 13:07:14 -0400 (EDT)
You probably know this Rodger, but just in case... Radials are ESSENTIAL. As many as you can as long as you can make them (up to 1/4 wave) in as many  directions as i s possible. I staple mine down w
/archives//html/Topband/2015-08/msg00025.html (11,067 bytes)

15. Re: Topband: 2 wl loop, worth the effort? (score: 1)
Author: kolson@rcn.com
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 13:48:54 -0500 (EST)
Well Rob, if you read Gary's email, you will find that he is interested in communicating "...with the hams I daily keep in touch with in the 500-600 mile range." The loop may be a great antenna for t
/archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00009.html (10,003 bytes)

16. Re: Topband: ARRL 160CW Contest QRP Portable Op (score: 1)
Author: kolson@rcn.com
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2015 11:39:51 -0500 (EST)
What would be much more fair is to go by ERP. 5 watts from one of tho se sophisticated antenna farms may very well be stronger than 100w or even 600w from, let's say, a Butte rnut with a vestigial ra
/archives//html/Topband/2015-12/msg00344.html (11,903 bytes)

17. Re: Topband: Stew Beef (score: 1)
Author: kolson@rcn.com
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2016 15:45:02 -0500 (EST)
What do you mean by that crack? (hi hi) Kevin K3OX As per usual... It all depends on whose ox is being gored. 73, Bill KU8H On 12/31/2015 03:48 PM, Joe Wilkowski wrote: that enough. this AC0C Nanowav
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00013.html (9,930 bytes)

18. Re: Topband: Stew Beef (score: 1)
Author: kolson@rcn.com
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 09:49:18 -0500 (EST)
"Back when the signal report was a real part of the exchange and contesters tended to exchange honest reports, a major contest could be an opportunity to determine how well your station got out" The
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00122.html (10,523 bytes)

19. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: kolson@rcn.com
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 12:40:43 -0500 (EST)
I keep hearing folks say that "stations are no longer licensed", but I can only find this in the FCC rules on the ARRL website: §97.5   Station license required. (a) The station apparatus must be und
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00345.html (14,527 bytes)

20. Re: Topband: strange propagation (score: 1)
Author: kolson@rcn.com
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 11:23:11 -0500 (EST)
I would see this as analo g ou s to what happened in contesting. Originally, you could use 2 meter spotting nets to help "find"  multipliers, no problem. Eventually, f olks in less populated areas co
/archives//html/Topband/2016-01/msg00419.html (11,265 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu